Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KWR
Quaker Chemical Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.46B
5Y Perf.-17.0%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$232.56B
5Y Perf.+148.0%
ECL
Ecolab Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$74.40B
5Y Perf.+23.9%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$66.84B
5Y Perf.+24.2%

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KWR logoKWR
LIN logoLIN
ECL logoECL
APD logoAPD
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$2.46B$232.56B$74.40B$66.84B
Revenue (TTM)$1.93B$34.66B$16.08B$12.46B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$7.13B$2.08B$2.11B
Gross Margin34.4%46.0%44.5%32.0%
Operating Margin3.7%28.8%17.7%18.4%
Forward P/E19.2x28.1x31.5x22.9x
Total Debt$929M$26.99B$9.43B$18.41B
Cash & Equiv.$180M$5.06B$646M$1.86B

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KWR
LIN
ECL
APD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Quaker Chemical Cor… (KWR)10083.0-17.0%
Linde plc (LIN)100248.0+148.0%
Ecolab Inc. (ECL)100123.9+23.9%
Air Products and Ch… (APD)100124.2+24.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Quaker Chemical Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. ECL and APD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KWR
Quaker Chemical Corporation
The Value Play

KWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (19.2x vs 22.9x)
  • +44.4% vs ECL's +5.4%
Best for: value and momentum
LIN
Linde plc
The Growth Play

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
  • 376.9% 10Y total return vs APD's 166.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
  • 3.0% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
The Niche Pick

ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 8.8% ROA vs KWR's 0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 6.6%
Best for: efficiency
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
The Income Pick

APD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
  • Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
  • 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLIN logoLIN3.0% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
ValueKWR logoKWRLower P/E (19.2x vs 22.9x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs KWR's 0.2%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.24 vs KWR's 1.35
DividendsAPD logoAPD2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)KWR logoKWR+44.4% vs ECL's +5.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ECL logoECL8.8% ROA vs KWR's 0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 6.6%

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KWRQuaker Chemical Corporation
FY 2025
Metalworking and Other
67.7%$1.3B
Metals
32.3%$611M
LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B
ECLEcolab Inc.
FY 2025
Global Water
49.6%$8.0B
Global Institutional and Specialty
38.0%$6.1B
Global Pest Elimination
7.8%$1.2B
Global Life Sciences
4.7%$748M
APDAir Products and Chemicals, Inc.
FY 2025
On-site
51.3%$6.2B
Merchant
44.3%$5.3B
Sale of Equipment
4.3%$520M

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKWRLAGGINGAPD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 18.0x KWR's $1.9B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWR's 0.2%. On growth, APD holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$34.7B$16.1B$12.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$143M$12.1B$3.5B$3.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$7.1B$2.1B$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$143M$5.1B$1.9B$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.4%+46.0%+44.5%+32.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.7%+28.8%+17.7%+18.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+20.6%+12.9%+16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+14.7%+11.8%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.5%+8.2%+4.8%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.8%+13.4%+19.3%+141.1%
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 34.4x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 5% valuation discount to ECL's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KWR's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APD's 121.4x.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Market CapShares × price$2.5B$232.6B$74.4B$66.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$254.5B$83.2B$83.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1013.29x34.40x36.18x-169.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.17x28.12x31.46x22.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.86x20.04x23.20x121.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.30x6.84x4.63x5.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.80x5.92x7.66x3.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.51x45.70x39.07x
KWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $0 for KWR. KWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APD's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.3%+17.8%+22.0%+11.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+8.3%+8.8%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+11.3%+12.7%-2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.6%+13.0%+15.8%-2.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94652
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.67x0.68x0.96x1.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$749M$21.9B$8.8B$16.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$180M$5.1B$646M$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$929M$27.0B$9.4B$18.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.41x34.52x9.82x12.00x
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LIN and ECL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,377 for KWR. Over the past 12 months, KWR leads with a +44.4% total return vs ECL's +5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 16.2% vs KWR's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.8%+17.3%+0.6%+21.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.4%+13.6%+5.4%+14.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.6%+41.9%+56.7%+8.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.2%+78.1%+20.3%+13.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+81.8%+376.9%+142.1%+166.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.5%+12.4%+16.2%+2.8%
Evenly matched — LIN and ECL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KWR's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs KWR's 77.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.35x0.24x0.63x0.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$183.00$521.28$309.27$307.29
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$99.18$387.78$249.04$229.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.5%+96.3%+85.2%+97.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.350.638.461.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded178K2.3M1.4M1.2M
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KWR as "Buy", LIN as "Buy", ECL as "Buy", APD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for KWR (target: $176) vs 4.2% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs ECL's 1.00%.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…LIN logoLINLinde plcECL logoECLEcolab Inc.APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$176.33$539.71$327.11$312.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts14283742
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+1.2%+1.0%+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises661229
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.97$6.00$2.64$7.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%+2.0%+1.1%0.0%
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KWR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallQuaker Chemical Corporation (KWR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 34.

4x versus Ecolab Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Quaker Chemical Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.

1%, compared to -36. 2% for Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus KWR's +81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Quaker Chemical Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning KWR is approximately 460% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 106% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.

0% versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -110. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -3. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -7. 3% for APD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECL leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) trades at 19.

2x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Ecolab Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KWR: 24. 3% to $176. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 0% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL).

09

Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, KWR: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KWR and LIN and ECL and APD?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KWR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ECL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KWR and LIN and ECL and APD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KWR: 8.5% · LIN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.