Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.46B | $232.56B | $74.40B | $66.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $34.66B | $16.08B | $12.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $7.13B | $2.08B | $2.11B |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 46.0% | 44.5% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 28.8% | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 28.1x | 31.5x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $929M | $26.99B | $9.43B | $18.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $5.06B | $646M | $1.86B |
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quaker Chemical Cor… (KWR) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
| Ecolab Inc. (ECL) | 100 | 123.9 | +23.9% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.2x vs 22.9x)
- +44.4% vs ECL's +5.4%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 376.9% 10Y total return vs APD's 166.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- 3.0% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 8.8% ROA vs KWR's 0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 6.6%
APD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs APD's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs KWR's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs KWR's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs ECL's +5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs KWR's 0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 6.6% |
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
KWR leads 1 • ECL leads 1 • APD leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 18.0x KWR's $1.9B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWR's 0.2%. On growth, APD holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $34.7B | $16.1B | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $143M | $12.1B | $3.5B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $7.1B | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $143M | $5.1B | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +46.0% | +44.5% | +32.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +28.8% | +17.7% | +18.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +20.6% | +12.9% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +14.7% | +11.8% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +8.2% | +4.8% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.8% | +13.4% | +19.3% | +141.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.4x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 5% valuation discount to ECL's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KWR's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APD's 121.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $232.6B | $74.4B | $66.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $254.5B | $83.2B | $83.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1013.29x | 34.40x | 36.18x | -169.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.17x | 28.12x | 31.46x | 22.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.36x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.86x | 20.04x | 23.20x | 121.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 6.84x | 4.63x | 5.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 5.92x | 7.66x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.51x | 45.70x | 39.07x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $0 for KWR. KWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APD's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.3% | +17.8% | +22.0% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +8.3% | +8.8% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +11.3% | +12.7% | -2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +13.0% | +15.8% | -2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.68x | 0.96x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $749M | $21.9B | $8.8B | $16.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $5.1B | $646M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $929M | $27.0B | $9.4B | $18.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 34.52x | 9.82x | 12.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LIN and ECL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,377 for KWR. Over the past 12 months, KWR leads with a +44.4% total return vs ECL's +5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 16.2% vs KWR's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +17.3% | +0.6% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | +13.6% | +5.4% | +14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.6% | +41.9% | +56.7% | +8.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.2% | +78.1% | +20.3% | +13.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.8% | +376.9% | +142.1% | +166.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.5% | +12.4% | +16.2% | +2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KWR's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs KWR's 77.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.24x | 0.63x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $183.00 | $521.28 | $309.27 | $307.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $99.18 | $387.78 | $249.04 | $229.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.5% | +96.3% | +85.2% | +97.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 50.6 | 38.4 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 2.3M | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KWR as "Buy", LIN as "Buy", ECL as "Buy", APD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for KWR (target: $176) vs 4.2% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs ECL's 1.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $176.33 | $539.71 | $327.11 | $312.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 28 | 37 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 6 | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.97 | $6.00 | $2.64 | $7.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
LIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KWR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KWR vs LIN vs ECL vs APD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 34.
4x versus Ecolab Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Quaker Chemical Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.
1%, compared to -36. 2% for Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus KWR's +81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Quaker Chemical Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning KWR is approximately 460% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 106% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -110. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -3. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -7. 3% for APD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECL leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) trades at 19.
2x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Ecolab Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KWR: 24. 3% to $176. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — KWR or LIN or ECL or APD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 0% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL).
09Is KWR or LIN or ECL or APD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, KWR: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KWR and LIN and ECL and APD?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.