Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KYIV vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
KYIV vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $919M | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $283M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.9% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $894M | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $9.03B |
Quick Verdict: KYIV vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KYIV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 24.8x)
- 30.8% margin vs NFLX's 24.3%
- +20.9% vs NFLX's -23.6%
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs KYIV's 20.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs KYIV's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.8% margin vs NFLX's 24.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs KYIV's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs KYIV's 13.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs 16.4% |
KYIV vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KYIV vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KYIV leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 49.2x KYIV's $919M. KYIV is the more profitable business, keeping 30.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFLX's 24.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $919M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KYIV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, KYIV trades at a 71% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KYIV's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.25x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.79x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.61x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.17x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.00x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $29 for KYIV. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KYIV's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs KYIV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.4% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.9% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $465M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $894M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.24x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,090 for KYIV. Over the past 12 months, KYIV leads with a +20.9% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs KYIV's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KYIV and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KYIV's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KYIV currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.48 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.29 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 714K | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for KYIV (target: $18) vs 31.8% for NFLX (target: $116).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
KYIV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NFLX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
KYIV vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KYIV or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV). Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KYIV or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KYIV or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to +20. 9% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus KYIV's +20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KYIV or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares's 1. 62β — meaning KYIV is approximately 316% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 83% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KYIV or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 0. 4% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KYIV or NFLX?
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 8% net margin versus 24. 3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KYIV leads at 37. 9% versus 29. 5% for NFLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYIV leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KYIV or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KYIV: 38. 8% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KYIV or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KYIV or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, KYIV: +20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KYIV and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KYIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.