Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $407M | $5.28B | $409M | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.03B | $0.00 | $7M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-161M | $-297M | $-168M | $-136M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.2% | — | -22.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 116.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $414M | $27M | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $902M | $83M | $47M |
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyverna Therapeutic… (KYTX) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
| Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) | 100 | 17.0 | -83.0% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KYTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 5.0% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
- +360.4% vs LEGN's -9.2%
LEGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.77
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- -22.8% 10Y total return vs FATE's 40.5%
- 64.5% revenue growth vs KYTX's -91.8%
CABA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 37.6%, current ratio 5.79x
- Beta 2.17, current ratio 5.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs KYTX's -91.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs FATE's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs KYTX's 3.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +360.4% vs LEGN's -9.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -17.6% ROA vs CABA's -90.2%, ROIC -12.7% vs -429.6% |
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LEGN leads in 3 of 6 categories
FATE leads 1 • KYTX leads 0 • CABA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN and CABA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -28.8% (LEGN) to -20.5% (FATE). On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.0B | $0 | $7M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$170M | -$107M | -$172M | -$148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$161M | -$297M | -$168M | -$136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$158M | -$231M | -$132M | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +60.3% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -13.2% | — | -22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -28.8% | — | -20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -22.4% | — | -13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +64.9% | — | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -2.2% | +36.9% | +38.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LEGN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $407M | $5.3B | $409M | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $319M | $4.8B | $353M | $312M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.79x | -8.87x | -2.44x | -2.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 116.25x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.11x | — | 42.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 2.63x | 3.65x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGN delivers a -29.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-29 in annual profit, vs $-122 for CABA. KYTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEGN's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYTX scores 5/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -106.0% | -29.2% | -121.7% | -65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.0% | -17.6% | -90.2% | -42.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -106.0% | -12.7% | -4.3% | -36.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -87.4% | -11.0% | -126.2% | -43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.41x | 0.24x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$488M | -$56M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $902M | $83M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $414M | $27M | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2204.37x | -12.69x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FATE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LEGN five years ago would be worth $9,997 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, KYTX leads with a +360.4% total return vs LEGN's -9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FATE at -23.6% vs KYTX's -32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | +32.8% | +81.0% | +145.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +360.4% | -9.2% | +244.8% | +143.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -58.4% | -65.8% | -55.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -0.0% | -58.2% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -22.8% | -60.0% | +40.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.3% | -25.4% | -30.1% | -23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGN and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KYTX's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs LEGN's 63.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 0.76x | 2.21x | 1.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.67 | $45.30 | $4.23 | $2.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.95 | $16.24 | $1.11 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +63.1% | +94.6% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 77.4 | 60.8 | 81.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 869K | 1.9M | 2.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KYTX as "Buy", LEGN as "Buy", CABA as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 102.6% for LEGN (target: $58).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.67 | $57.89 | $16.33 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 | 12 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
LEGN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FATE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
KYTX vs LEGN vs CABA vs FATE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Analysts rate Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (KYTX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE?
Over the past 5 years, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) delivered a total return of -0.
0%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FATE returned +38. 2% versus KYTX's -68. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 99β — meaning KYTX is approximately 295% more volatile than LEGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (KYTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 41% for Legend Biotech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cabaletta Bio, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Legend Biotech Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE?
Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KYTX leads at 0. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGN leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KYTX or LEGN or CABA or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76)). Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (KYTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEGN: -24. 0%, KYTX: -68. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KYTX and LEGN and CABA and FATE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KYTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.