Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
L vs TRV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
L vs TRV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $21.48B | $64.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.29B | $48.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.87B | $6.29B |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $9.49B | $9.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $495M | $842M |
L vs TRV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loews Corporation (L) | 100 | 314.1 | +214.1% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: L vs TRV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
L is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 24.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.0%
- 5.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2%
- +19.2% vs TRV's +12.8%
TRV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.4%
- 201.4% 10Y total return vs L's 171.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 28.2%, current ratio 0.23x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs L's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs L's 0.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs L's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.2% vs TRV's +12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs L's 2.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 6.2% |
L vs TRV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
L vs TRV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.8B annually — 2.7x L's $18.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (TRV) to 10.2% (L).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.3B | $48.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $8.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $7.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — L and TRV each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, TRV trades at a 17% valuation discount to L's 13.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRV's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than L's 10.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.5B | $64.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.5B | $73.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.10x | 10.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.54x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.96x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRV leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRV delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for L. TRV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to L's 0.48x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.0B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $495M | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.5B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.93x | 19.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — L and TRV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRV five years ago would be worth $19,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,080 for L. Over the past 12 months, L leads with a +19.2% total return vs TRV's +12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors L at 21.4% vs TRV's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.2% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.8% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.8% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.2% | +201.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TRV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRV is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than L's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRV currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs L's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.90 | $313.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.59 | $249.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 624K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TRV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates L as "Buy" and TRV as "Hold". For income investors, TRV offers the higher dividend yield at 1.44% vs L's 0.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $313.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +4.8% |
TRV leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
L vs TRV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is L or TRV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loews Corporation (L) is the stronger pick with 5.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Loews Corporation (L) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — L or TRV?
On trailing P/E, The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus Loews Corporation at 13. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — L or TRV?
Over the past 5 years, The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) delivered a total return of +98. 2%, compared to +80. 8% for Loews Corporation (L). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRV returned +201. 4% versus L's +171. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — L or TRV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Loews Corporation's 0. 31β — meaning L is approximately 39% more volatile than TRV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 48% for Loews Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — L or TRV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loews Corporation (L) is pulling ahead at 5.
4% versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Travelers Companies, Inc. grew EPS 27. 8% year-over-year, compared to 24. 3% for Loews Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRV leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — L or TRV?
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 9. 2% for Loews Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRV leads at 16. 0% versus 12. 6% for L. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRV leads at 44. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — L or TRV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 2% for Loews Corporation (L).
08Is L or TRV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 4% yield, +201. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRV: +201. 4%, L: +171. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between L and TRV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TRV pays a dividend while L does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.