Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LAB
Standard BioTools Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.-83.0%
SEER
Seer, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$104M
5Y Perf.-96.7%
CDNA
CareDx, Inc

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.-69.9%
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$426M
5Y Perf.-94.6%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.55B
5Y Perf.-60.5%

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LAB logoLAB
SEER logoSEER
CDNA logoCDNA
PACB logoPACB
ILMN logoILMN
IndustryMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$398M$104M$1.13B$426M$21.55B
Revenue (TTM)$66M$16M$413M$160M$4.39B
Net Income (TTM)$78M$-79M$-8M$-129M$853M
Gross Margin51.9%40.7%48.2%37.1%67.1%
Operating Margin-110.9%-5.2%-3.3%-101.7%20.9%
Forward P/E23.3x27.2x
Total Debt$31M$26M$20M$759M$2.55B
Cash & Equiv.$118M$41M$65M$64M$1.42B

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LAB
SEER
CDNA
PACB
ILMN
StockDec 20May 26Return
Standard BioTools I… (LAB)10017.0-83.0%
Seer, Inc. (SEER)1003.3-96.7%
CareDx, Inc (CDNA)10030.1-69.9%
Pacific Biosciences… (PACB)1005.4-94.6%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10039.5-60.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LAB and CDNA are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. CareDx, Inc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SEER and ILMN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LAB
Standard BioTools Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LAB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 119.1% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
  • 13.6% ROA vs SEER's -25.7%, ROIC -20.7% vs -21.3%
Best for: quality and efficiency
SEER
Seer, Inc.
The Income Pick

SEER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.80
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
  • Beta 0.80, current ratio 16.53x
  • Beta 0.80 vs PACB's 2.41, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
The Growth Play

CDNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -143.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
  • 393.7% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 3.0%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs LAB's -51.1%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PACB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ILMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +78.3% vs LAB's -8.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDNA logoCDNA13.8% revenue growth vs LAB's -51.1%
ValueCDNA logoCDNABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLAB logoLAB119.1% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
Stability / SafetySEER logoSEERBeta 0.80 vs PACB's 2.41, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+78.3% vs LAB's -8.9%
Efficiency (ROA)LAB logoLAB13.6% ROA vs SEER's -25.7%, ROIC -20.7% vs -21.3%

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LABStandard BioTools Inc.
FY 2025
Product
41.9%$62M
Consumables
24.7%$36M
Instruments
17.3%$25M
Service and Other Revenue
16.1%$24M
SEERSeer, Inc.
FY 2023
Grant
100.0%$1M
CDNACareDx, Inc
FY 2025
Service
85.0%$274M
Product
15.0%$48M
PACBPacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
45.9%$136M
Consumable
27.7%$82M
Instrument
18.2%$54M
Service And Other
8.2%$24M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDNALAGGINGPACB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 269.0x SEER's $16M. LAB is the more profitable business, keeping 119.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEER's -4.9%. On growth, CDNA holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$66M$16M$413M$160M$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$66M-$76M$2M-$151M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$78M-$79M-$8M-$129M$853M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$94M-$46M$65M-$116M$989M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.9%+40.7%+48.2%+37.1%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-110.9%-5.2%-3.3%-101.7%+20.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+119.1%-4.9%-2.0%-80.3%+19.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-143.8%-2.8%+15.8%-72.6%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-48.2%+4.5%+39.0%+0.1%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.7%+8.6%+126.3%+97.9%+6.1%
ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDNA leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$398M$104M$1.1B$426M$21.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$311M$90M$1.1B$1.1B$22.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.10x-1.35x-54.55x-0.77x26.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.25x27.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.67x7.48x2.97x2.66x4.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.92x0.36x3.84x79.07x8.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF31.21x23.15x
CDNA leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PACB. CDNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PACB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%-29.2%-2.6%-2.5%+32.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.6%-25.7%-1.9%-16.1%+13.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.7%-21.3%-5.7%-45.8%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-18.6%-25.9%-5.8%-58.0%+17.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934538
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.08x0.06x141.98x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$87M-$15M-$46M$696M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$118M$41M$65M$64M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$31M$26M$20M$759M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2937.25x-44.67x12.09x
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CDNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $576 for SEER. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +78.3% total return vs LAB's -8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 38.5% vs PACB's -51.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.7%+2.7%+14.0%-23.4%+5.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.9%-1.1%+41.8%+17.5%+78.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-38.2%-47.5%+165.8%-88.5%-25.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.2%-94.2%-67.3%-93.9%-61.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-96.7%+393.7%-84.0%+3.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.8%-19.3%+38.5%-51.4%-9.3%
CDNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SEER and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACB's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs PACB's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x0.80x1.36x2.41x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.72$2.41$23.24$2.73$155.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.87$1.65$10.96$0.85$75.24
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.3%+77.6%+93.9%+51.6%+91.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.849.059.055.759.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.7M392K658K6.0M1.5M
Evenly matched — SEER and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LAB as "Buy", SEER as "Hold", CDNA as "Buy", PACB as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 218.6% upside for LAB (target: $3) vs -29.1% for PACB (target: $1).

MetricLAB logoLABStandard BioTools…SEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncPACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.25$4.00$24.00$1.00$147.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts104131850
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+11.3%+7.8%0.0%+3.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CDNA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallCareDx, Inc (CDNA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LAB vs SEER vs CDNA vs PACB vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the stronger pick with 13.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 1% for Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

On forward P/E, CareDx, Inc is actually cheaper at 23.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) delivered a total return of -61. 6%, compared to -94. 2% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +393. 7% versus SEER's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc.

(SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 's 2. 41β — meaning PACB is approximately 202% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is pulling ahead at 13.

8% versus -51. 1% for Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEER leads at 29. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -620. 9% for Seer, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -717. 7% for SEER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDNA leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) trades at 23.

3x forward P/E versus 27. 2x for Illumina, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAB: 218. 6% to $3. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LAB or SEER or CDNA or PACB or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc.

(SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96. 7%, PACB: -84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LAB and SEER and CDNA and PACB and ILMN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LAB

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 71%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEER

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PACB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LAB and SEER and CDNA and PACB and ILMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LAB: -48.2% · SEER: 4.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.