Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Security & Protection Services
Oil & Gas Midstream
Conglomerates
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Insurance - Specialty | Security & Protection Services | Oil & Gas Midstream | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $106M | $569M | $6.67B | $3.33B | $136.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $325M | $1.92B | $1.73B | $36.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $46M | $291M | $228M | $4.10B |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 47.6% | 46.8% | 24.8% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | 17.8% | 22.0% | 8.2% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.4x | 19.8x | 42.4x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $491K | $627M | $3.87B | $34.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $62M | $165M | $4M | $12.49B |
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| MSA Safety Incorpor… (MSA) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 702.3 | +602.3% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LAKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 34.1% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
AMSF is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.23 vs LAKE's 1.35, lower leverage
MSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 294.0% 10Y total return vs HON's 135.1%
- PEG 1.13 vs HON's 11.18
- Lower P/E (19.8x vs 20.5x), PEG 1.13 vs 11.18
- 15.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
KNTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 16.5%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- Beta 0.60, yield 16.5%, current ratio 0.69x
- 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HON's 2.1%
Among these 5 stocks, HON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 20.5x), PEG 1.13 vs 11.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs LAKE's 1.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HON's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -5.1% |
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSA leads in 1 of 6 categories
LAKE leads 1 • AMSF leads 1 • KNTK leads 1 • HON leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 190.0x LAKE's $193M. MSA is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, AMSF holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $325M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $58M | $496M | $534M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $46M | $291M | $228M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $8M | $309M | $441M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +47.6% | +46.8% | +24.8% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +17.8% | +22.0% | +8.2% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | +14.3% | +15.2% | +13.2% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +2.5% | +16.1% | +25.5% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +10.3% | +10.0% | -7.5% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -165.0% | -8.5% | +21.2% | -2.4% | -41.9% |
Valuation Metrics
LAKE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 58% valuation discount to HON's 29.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSA offers better value at 1.38x vs HON's 15.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $569M | $6.7B | $3.3B | $136.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $120M | $508M | $7.1B | $7.2B | $159.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 12.27x | 24.25x | 18.43x | 29.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.42x | 19.76x | 42.44x | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.38x | — | 15.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.53x | 15.05x | 13.14x | 19.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.80x | 3.56x | 1.89x | 3.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 2.30x | 4.95x | 1.04x | 9.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.83x | 22.56x | 44.78x | 25.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HON delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-28 for LAKE. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.9% | +9.7% | +22.0% | +21.1% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.0% | +5.6% | +11.4% | +4.2% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +21.9% | +17.9% | +1.9% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +16.8% | +19.2% | +2.5% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.00x | 0.46x | 1.32x | 2.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | -$61M | $462M | $3.9B | $22.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $62M | $165M | $4M | $12.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $491,000 | $627M | $3.9B | $34.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.38x | — | 12.70x | 5.98x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNTK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNTK five years ago would be worth $19,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,174 for LAKE. Over the past 12 months, KNTK leads with a +28.0% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNTK at 24.7% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | -18.3% | +6.3% | +37.4% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | -29.2% | +11.7% | +28.0% | +2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | -24.8% | +31.5% | +93.9% | +16.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.3% | -18.9% | +9.7% | +93.1% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +31.8% | +294.0% | -33.5% | +135.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | -9.1% | +9.6% | +24.7% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMSF and KNTK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAKE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.23x | 0.90x | 0.60x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.50 | $48.54 | $208.92 | $51.11 | $248.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.15 | $29.42 | $151.10 | $31.33 | $186.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +62.4% | +82.3% | +94.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 34.2 | 55.8 | 51.3 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 212K | 209K | 1.2M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAKE as "Buy", AMSF as "Buy", MSA as "Buy", KNTK as "Buy", HON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs -1.8% for KNTK (target: $48). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $44.50 | $235.00 | $47.57 | $243.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +8.4% | +1.2% | +16.5% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $2.55 | $2.09 | $7.98 | $4.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.1% | +1.3% | +5.3% | +2.8% |
MSA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LAKE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LAKE vs AMSF vs MSA vs KNTK vs HON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Honeywell International Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MSA Safety Incorporated wins at 1. 13x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
Over the past 5 years, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) delivered a total return of +93. 1%, compared to -58. 3% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSA returned +294. 0% versus KNTK's -33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Lakeland Industries, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning LAKE is approximately 486% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
9% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSA leads at 21. 4% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSA leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 46. 9% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE).
09Is LAKE or AMSF or MSA or KNTK or HON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, LAKE: +34. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LAKE and AMSF and MSA and KNTK and HON?
These companies operate in different sectors (LAKE (Consumer Cyclical) and AMSF (Financial Services) and MSA (Industrials) and KNTK (Energy) and HON (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.