LAMR
Lamar Advertising Company
REIT - Specialty
Market Cap$15.35B
5Y Perf.+138.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LAMR vs OMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$23.87B
5Y Perf.+40.6%
LAMR vs OMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LAMR | OMC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $15.35B | $23.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.29B | $19.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $550M | $63M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.3x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $6.18B | $12.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65M | $6.88B |
LAMR vs OMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LAMR
OMC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Advertising C… (LAMR) | 100 | 238.2 | +138.2% |
| Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAMR vs OMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LAMR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Omnicom Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LAMR
Lamar Advertising Company
The Real Estate Income Play
LAMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 4.3%
- 206.2% 10Y total return vs OMC's 23.5%
- Beta 0.64, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
The Growth Play
OMC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth -103.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 97.9%, current ratio 0.93x
- 10.1% revenue growth vs LAMR's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OMC | 10.1% revenue growth vs LAMR's 2.7% |
| Value | OMC | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 27.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | LAMR | 24.0% margin vs OMC's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | OMC | Beta 0.60 vs LAMR's 0.64, lower leverage |
| Dividends | LAMR | 4.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs OMC's 3.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | LAMR | +33.2% vs OMC's +5.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LAMR | 8.0% ROA vs OMC's 0.2%, ROIC 8.2% vs 14.5% |
LAMR vs OMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
LAMR vs OMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLAMRLAGGINGOMC
OMCOmnicom Group Inc.
1leads
LAMRLamar Advertising Com…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OMCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LAMR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OMC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LAMR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LAMR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
LAMR2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.8B annually — 8.7x LAMR's $2.3B. LAMR is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMC's 0.3%. On growth, OMC holds the edge at +69.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $19.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $550M | $63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $769M | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +69.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.9% | +40.7% |
LAMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OMC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OMC's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAMR's 21.0x.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.4B | $23.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.5B | $29.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.20x | -284.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.34x | 7.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.96x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.78x | 1.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.99x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.86x | 8.56x |
OMC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR delivers a 55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $1 for OMC. OMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAMR's 6.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LAMR scores 6/9 vs OMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.5% | +0.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.04x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.1B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65M | $6.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.2B | $12.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.83x | 2.51x |
LAMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAMR five years ago would be worth $16,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,725 for OMC. Over the past 12 months, LAMR leads with a +33.2% total return vs OMC's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAMR at 21.3% vs OMC's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.1% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.2% | +5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.3% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.1% | +7.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +206.2% | +23.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.3% | -2.4% |
LAMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LAMR and OMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAMR's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAMR currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs OMC's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.36 | $87.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $112.00 | $66.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 557K | 4.3M |
Evenly matched — LAMR and OMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LAMR as "Buy" and OMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for OMC (target: $94) vs 2.5% for LAMR (target: $155). For income investors, LAMR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs OMC's 3.49%.
| Metric | LAMRLamar Advertising… | OMCOmnicom Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $155.00 | $93.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.46 | $2.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +3.0% |
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
LAMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallLamar Advertising Company (LAMR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LAMR vs OMC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAMR or OMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR). Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E (27. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LAMR or OMC?
On forward P/E, Omnicom Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LAMR or OMC?
Over the past 5 years, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) delivered a total return of +68.
1%, compared to +7. 2% for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAMR returned +216. 9% versus OMC's +23. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LAMR or OMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Lamar Advertising Company's 0. 64β — meaning LAMR is approximately 11% more volatile than OMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 6% for Lamar Advertising Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LAMR or OMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus 2. 7% for Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lamar Advertising Company grew EPS 63. 9% year-over-year, compared to -103. 6% for Omnicom Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMC leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LAMR or OMC?
Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -0. 3% for Omnicom Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAMR leads at 30. 8% versus 15. 0% for OMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAMR leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LAMR or OMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for Lamar Advertising Company — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMC: 21. 8% to $93. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LAMR or OMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 3. 5% for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC).
09Is LAMR or OMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 4. 3% yield, +216. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAMR: +216. 9%, OMC: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LAMR and OMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (LAMR (Real Estate) and OMC (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Revenue Growth>
%
(LAMR: 4.5% · OMC: 69.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.