Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LARK vs FBIZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
LARK vs FBIZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $171M | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $279M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $51M |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 21.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $31M |
LARK vs FBIZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark Bancorp, I… (LARK) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LARK vs FBIZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LARK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 1.01x
FBIZ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs LARK's 116.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LARK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +21.0% vs LARK's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs FBIZ's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 9.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LARK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs FBIZ's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.0% vs LARK's -0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LARK's 0.5% |
LARK vs FBIZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LARK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 2.9x LARK's $96M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.6% (LARK) to 18.0% (FBIZ).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $279M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
LARK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, LARK trades at a 2% valuation discount to FBIZ's 9.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LARK's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBIZ's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171M | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $184M | $702M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.13x | 9.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | 11.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.13x | 7.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LARK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $12 for LARK. LARK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIZ's 0.70x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $259M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,115 for LARK. Over the past 12 months, FBIZ leads with a +21.0% total return vs LARK's -0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIZ at 33.2% vs LARK's 19.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.5% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.2% | +130.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | +161.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LARK and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LARK is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIZ's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.80 | $60.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.43 | $45.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LARK and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, LARK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs FBIZ's 2.09%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
LARK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FBIZ leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LARK vs FBIZ: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LARK or FBIZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ). Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LARK or FBIZ?
On trailing P/E, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the cheapest at 9. 1x versus First Business Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LARK or FBIZ?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +61. 2% for Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus LARK's +116. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LARK or FBIZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus First Business Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning FBIZ is approximately 82% more volatile than LARK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 70% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LARK or FBIZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus 6. 4% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Landmark Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 35. 8% year-over-year, compared to 16. 5% for First Business Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LARK or FBIZ?
Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus 18. 0% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LARK leads at 24. 0% versus 21. 6% for FBIZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LARK leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LARK or FBIZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 1% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ).
08Is LARK or FBIZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 2. 8% yield, +116. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LARK: +116. 1%, FBIZ: +161. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LARK and FBIZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.