Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $171M | $473M | $203M | $3.03B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $279M | $90M | $870M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $51M | $14M | $145M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 57.3% | 54.7% | 61.6% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 21.6% | 7.0% | 21.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 9.1x | 11.8x | 12.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $259M | $52M | $1.34B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $31M | $119M | $181M | $599M |
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark Bancorp, I… (LARK) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LARK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 1.01x
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.01x
- NIM 3.5% vs SBCF's 2.7%
FBIZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.2% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs 2.0%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
Among these 5 stocks, SBCF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs SBCF's 6.62
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs SBCF's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs 2.0% |
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LARK leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • SBCF leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LARK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. LARK is the more profitable business, keeping 19.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $279M | $90M | $870M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $49M | $9M | $202M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $51M | $14M | $145M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $53M | $11M | $179M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +57.3% | +54.7% | +61.6% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +21.6% | +7.0% | +21.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +18.0% | +16.0% | +16.7% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +21.9% | +11.5% | +20.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | +12.9% | +63.0% | -27.5% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, LARK trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs SBCF's 10.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171M | $473M | $203M | $3.0B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $184M | $702M | $136M | $4.2B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.13x | 9.36x | 14.44x | 19.65x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.15x | 11.78x | 12.41x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | 2.85x | 10.49x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | 11.61x | 15.28x | 22.45x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 1.69x | 2.25x | 3.49x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.25x | 1.09x | 0.93x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.13x | 7.74x | 19.55x | 16.95x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LARK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. LARK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIZ's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LARK scores 8/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +14.1% | +7.8% | +5.8% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +7.0% | +2.0% | +3.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.6% | +0.6% | +3.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.70x | 0.28x | 0.44x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $229M | -$67M | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $31M | $119M | $181M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $259M | $52M | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.42x | 0.16x | 0.66x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +7.1% | +21.5% | -1.2% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.5% | +21.0% | +45.6% | +31.5% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | +136.5% | +160.0% | +67.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.2% | +130.9% | +71.2% | -10.7% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | +161.7% | +157.0% | +121.9% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +33.2% | +37.5% | +18.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LARK and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LARK is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBIZ currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.81x | 0.46x | 1.19x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.80 | $60.54 | $22.62 | $35.55 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.43 | $45.90 | $12.83 | $23.48 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +93.7% | +93.2% | +87.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 49.1 | 63.7 | 48.7 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 39K | 40K | 741K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIZ and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBIZ as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", SBCF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 4.7% for SBCF (target: $33). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 | — | $32.50 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.1% | +1.8% | +2.4% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $1.19 | $0.37 | $0.74 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LARK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LARK vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the cheapest at 9. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 19β — meaning SBCF is approximately 166% more volatile than LARK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 70% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Landmark Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 35. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
(LARK) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LARK leads at 24. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LARK leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is LARK or FBIZ or CZWI or SBCF or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, SBCF: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LARK and FBIZ and CZWI and SBCF and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LARK (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LARK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.