Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Agricultural - Machinery
Communication Equipment
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $16M | $1.30B | $1.21B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $287M | $1.48B | $359M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $36M | $26M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 35.2% | 26.1% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -126.5% | 11.4% | 3.7% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.3x | 14.2x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $37M | $320M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $534K | $5M | $72M | $108M |
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Photonics Cor… (LASE) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| NPK International I… (NPKI) | 100 | 184.6 | +84.6% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 137.3 | +37.3% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 195.5 | +95.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LASE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NPKI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- 27.4% revenue growth vs LASE's -13.3%
- +94.9% vs LASE's -74.1%
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 29.3x)
ITRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- 233.6% 10Y total return vs NPKI's 91.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs LASE's -13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 29.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs LASE's -105.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs LASE's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ASTE's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.9% vs LASE's -74.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs LASE's -43.1%, ROIC 47.2% vs -42.1% |
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 5 of 6 categories
LASE leads 0 • NPKI leads 0 • ASTE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASTE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 206.9x LASE's $7M. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LASE's -105.4%. On growth, LASE holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $287M | $1.5B | $359M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $53M | $84M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $36M | $26M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $32M | $44M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +35.2% | +26.1% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -126.5% | +11.4% | +3.7% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.4% | +12.4% | +1.7% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.7% | +11.1% | +3.0% | +19.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +15.9% | +20.3% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | 0.0% | -90.3% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LASE and ASTE and ITRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 45% valuation discount to NPKI's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ITRN's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPKI's 18.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.29x | 36.75x | 31.55x | 20.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.34x | 14.17x | 17.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.49x | 14.36x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.70x | 4.71x | 0.86x | 3.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 3.77x | 1.80x | 5.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.58x | 56.50x | 20.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-184 for LASE. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LASE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPKI scores 7/9 vs LASE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -183.5% | +10.3% | +3.8% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.1% | +8.5% | +2.0% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.1% | +9.9% | +6.2% | +47.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.9% | +12.7% | +7.2% | +29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.10x | 0.47x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $31M | $248M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $533,871 | $5M | $72M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $37M | $320M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.60x | 77.08x | 5.48x | 32.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITRN five years ago would be worth $28,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,805 for LASE. Over the past 12 months, NPKI leads with a +94.9% total return vs LASE's -74.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITRN at 45.2% vs LASE's -38.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.8% | +27.6% | +19.0% | +42.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.1% | +94.9% | +40.5% | +76.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +91.5% | +31.7% | +206.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | +91.5% | -20.4% | +180.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | +91.5% | +22.1% | +233.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.4% | +24.2% | +9.6% | +45.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LASE's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs LASE's 10.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.47x | 1.63x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.77 | $16.50 | $65.65 | $59.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $7.63 | $36.43 | $32.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.7% | +93.5% | +80.7% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.5 | 56.6 | 39.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 795K | 227K | 118K |
Analyst Outlook
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NPKI as "Buy", ASTE as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -5.0% upside for ITRN (target: $56) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs ASTE's 0.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $36.00 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.51 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ITRN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
LASE vs NPKI vs ASTE vs ITRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NPK International Inc. (NPKI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus NPK International Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Astec Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
Over the past 5 years, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to -72. 0% for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITRN returned +233. 6% versus LASE's -72. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Laser Photonics Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning LASE is approximately 43% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 49% for Laser Photonics Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -13. 3% for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -73. 8% for Laser Photonics Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus -189. 3% for LASE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for NPK International Inc. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRN: -5. 0% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield), ASTE (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. LASE, NPKI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LASE or NPKI or ASTE or ITRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), 3. 2% yield, +233. 6% 10Y return). Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITRN: +233. 6%, LASE: -72. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LASE and NPKI and ASTE and ITRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (LASE (Industrials) and NPKI (Energy) and ASTE (Industrials) and ITRN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LASE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ASTE, ITRN pay a dividend while LASE, NPKI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.