Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LAW
CS Disco, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$264M
5Y Perf.-90.0%
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.19B
5Y Perf.-34.7%
LFST
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.-67.5%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$276M
5Y Perf.-97.1%

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LAW logoLAW
LEGN logoLEGN
LFST logoLFST
FATE logoFATE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationBiotechnologyMedical - Care FacilitiesBiotechnology
Market Cap$264M$5.19B$2.98B$276M
Revenue (TTM)$162M$1.03B$1.49B$7M
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$-297M$23M$-136M
Gross Margin74.9%60.3%21.7%
Operating Margin-28.1%-13.2%3.0%-22.2%
Forward P/E116.2x102.7x
Total Debt$0.00$414M$194M$78M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$902M$249M$47M

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LAW
LEGN
LFST
FATE
StockJul 21May 26Return
CS Disco, Inc. (LAW)10010.0-90.0%
Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN)10065.3-34.7%
LifeStance Health G… (LFST)10032.5-67.5%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1002.9-97.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LFST leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CS Disco, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. LEGN and FATE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LAW
CS Disco, Inc.
The Income Pick

LAW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.67
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 3.78x
  • Beta 0.67, current ratio 3.78x
  • Beta 0.67 vs FATE's 1.99
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

LEGN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -24.0% 10Y total return vs FATE's 38.2%
  • 64.5% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
LFST
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LFST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 1.6% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
  • 1.1% ROA vs FATE's -42.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs -36.5%
Best for: growth exposure
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +132.0% vs LEGN's -12.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLEGN logoLEGN64.5% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
ValueLFST logoLFSTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLFST logoLFST1.6% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Stability / SafetyLAW logoLAWBeta 0.67 vs FATE's 1.99
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FATE logoFATE+132.0% vs LEGN's -12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LFST logoLFST1.1% ROA vs FATE's -42.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs -36.5%

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LAWCS Disco, Inc.
FY 2025
Software
85.4%$134M
Service
14.6%$23M
LEGNLegend Biotech Corporation
FY 2021
Licensing Of Intellectual Property
100.0%$5M
LFSTLifeStance Health Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLFSTLAGGINGLEGN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LFST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LFST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 224.9x FATE's $7M. LFST is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$162M$1.0B$1.5B$7M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$41M-$107M$100M-$148M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M-$297M$23M-$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$231M$179M-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.9%+60.3%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-28.1%-13.2%+3.0%-22.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.3%-28.8%+1.6%-20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.9%-22.4%+12.0%-13.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+64.9%+21.2%-26.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.1%-2.2%+38.6%
LFST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LAW and LEGN and LFST and FATE each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$264M$5.2B$3.0B$276M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$245M$4.7B$2.9B$307M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.72x-8.73x384.75x-2.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.116.25x102.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple36.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x5.03x2.10x41.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.99x2.59x1.98x1.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.12x
Evenly matched — LAW and LEGN and LFST and FATE each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LFST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

LFST delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-66 for FATE. LFST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEGN's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFST scores 7/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-32.7%-29.2%+1.6%-65.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-25.2%-17.6%+1.1%-42.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-34.0%-12.7%+1.2%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.4%-11.0%+1.3%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94272
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.13x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M-$488M-$55M$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$902M$249M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$414M$194M$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-12.69x3.30x
LFST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FATE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LEGN five years ago would be worth $9,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $316 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +132.0% total return vs LEGN's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFST at -3.3% vs LEGN's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.6%+30.7%+10.6%+141.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.3%-12.2%+32.4%+132.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.6%-59.1%-9.5%-56.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.0%-4.2%-64.9%-96.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.0%-24.0%-64.9%+38.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.6%-25.8%-3.3%-24.0%
FATE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LAW and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LAW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs LAW's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.67x0.76x1.06x1.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.11$45.30$8.89$2.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.45$16.24$3.74$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.2%+62.1%+86.6%+97.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.274.879.382.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded375K1.9M3.2M1.9M
Evenly matched — LAW and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LAW as "Hold", LEGN as "Buy", LFST as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1552.7% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 26.1% for LFST (target: $10).

MetricLAW logoLAWCS Disco, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…LFST logoLFSTLifeStance Health…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.00$57.89$9.70$39.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts11191131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LFST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FATE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallLifeStance Health Group, In… (LFST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LAW vs LEGN vs LFST vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) offers the better valuation at 384. 8x trailing P/E (102. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

On forward P/E, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 102. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) delivered a total return of -4.

2%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FATE returned +38. 2% versus LAW's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CS Disco, Inc.

(LAW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning FATE is approximately 195% more volatile than LAW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 41% for Legend Biotech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.

5% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeStance Health Group, Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Legend Biotech Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

(LFST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 7% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFST leads at 1. 8% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAW leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

(LFST) trades at 102. 7x forward P/E versus 116. 2x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1552. 7% to $39. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LAW or LEGN or LFST or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CS Disco, Inc.

(LAW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67)). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAW: -90. 0%, FATE: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LAW and LEGN and LFST and FATE?

These companies operate in different sectors (LAW (Technology) and LEGN (Healthcare) and LFST (Healthcare) and FATE (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LAW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LFST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LAW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LEGN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LFST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LAW and LEGN and LFST and FATE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LAW: 14.3% · LEGN: 64.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.