LAZ vs PWP vs EVR vs PJT

For growth investors, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 5% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lazard Ltd (LAZ) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) is the cheapest at 21.

5x versus Perella Weinberg Partners at 35. 2x. On forward P/E, Lazard Ltd is actually cheaper at 14. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Evercore Inc. wins at 1. 56x versus PJT Partners Inc. 's 2. 34x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) delivered a total return of +142. 1%, compared to +19. 5% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PJT returned +638. 5% versus LAZ's +99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PJT Partners Inc.

(PJT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Evercore Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning EVR is approximately 73% more volatile than PJT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 3% for Lazard Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus -14. 5% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perella Weinberg Partners grew EPS 145. 1% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Lazard Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus 4. 7% for Perella Weinberg Partners — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PJT leads at 21. 2% versus 6. 4% for PWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVR leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Evercore Inc. (EVR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 56x versus PJT Partners Inc. 's 2. 34x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for PJT Partners Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVR: 14. 8% to $382. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 6% for PJT Partners Inc. (PJT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, PJT Partners Inc.

(PJT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 0. 6% yield, +638. 5% 10Y return). Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PJT: +638. 5%, PWP: +108. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LAZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PWP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PJT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.