Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.13B
5Y Perf.+94.7%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+19.2%
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.19B
5Y Perf.-63.9%
RES
RPC, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.58B
5Y Perf.-23.8%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+214.7%

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LBRT logoLBRT
PUMP logoPUMP
ACDC logoACDC
RES logoRES
NINE logoNINE
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$5.13B$1.91B$1.19B$1.58B$427M
Revenue (TTM)$4.05B$1.18B$1.94B$1.63B$571M
Net Income (TTM)$150M$-12M$-367M$32M$-41M
Gross Margin10.7%8.3%3.7%14.3%11.5%
Operating Margin1.5%-1.1%-8.5%3.5%2.0%
Forward P/E3480.2x1993.6x34.6x
Total Debt$873M$249M$1.14B$95M$383M
Cash & Equiv.$28M$91M$23M$210M$18M

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LBRT
PUMP
ACDC
RES
NINE
StockMay 22May 26Return
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100194.7+94.7%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100119.2+19.2%
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10036.1-63.9%
RPC, Inc. (RES)10076.2-23.8%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100314.7+214.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LBRT and RES are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. RPC, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. NINE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LBRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 94.1% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 7.2%
  • 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
  • 1.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs RES's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

PUMP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ACDC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
RES
RPC, Inc.
The Income Pick

RES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth -65.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 3.24x
  • Beta 0.54, yield 2.2%, current ratio 3.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRES logoRES15.0% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueRES logoRESBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLBRT logoLBRT3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyRES logoRESBeta 0.54 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsLBRT logoLBRT1.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs RES's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Efficiency (ROA)LBRT logoLBRT4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M
RESRPC, Inc.
FY 2025
Technical Services
94.4%$1.5B
Support Services
5.6%$91M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRESLAGGINGNINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 7.1x NINE's $571M. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, RES holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.0B$1.2B$1.9B$1.6B$571M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$549M$154M$251M$218M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$150M-$12M-$367M$32M-$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$193M-$11M$20M$53M-$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.7%+8.3%+3.7%+14.3%+11.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.5%-1.1%-8.5%+3.5%+2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.7%-1.1%-18.9%+2.0%-7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.8%-0.9%+1.0%+3.3%-1.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%-24.7%-4.0%+27.0%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.7%-134.2%-33.3%-124.9%-34.6%
RES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 35.6x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RES's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Market CapShares × price$5.1B$1.9B$1.2B$1.6B$427M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.0B$2.1B$2.3B$1.5B$791M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS35.58x1993.59x-2.86x47.57x-7.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3480.22x34.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.28x10.67x8.19x6.73x337.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.28x1.50x0.61x0.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.53x1.98x1.20x1.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF363.85x44.88x60.74x29.88x
RES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. RES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%-1.4%-38.2%+2.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.0%-1.0%-13.1%+2.2%-11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+1.4%-4.6%+4.8%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+1.8%-6.2%+4.6%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945341
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.30x1.30x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$846M$158M$1.1B-$115M$364M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$28M$91M$23M$210M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$873M$249M$1.1B$95M$383M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.24x-0.86x-1.22x10.86x0.24x
RES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs ACDC's +55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs ACDC's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+68.2%+58.4%+62.9%+29.7%+2682.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+186.8%+201.4%+55.9%+56.5%+1505.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+166.1%+132.8%-35.5%+9.6%+150.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.4%+41.6%-63.7%+31.8%+385.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+94.1%+7.2%-63.7%-36.1%-62.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.6%+32.5%-13.6%+3.1%+35.7%
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RES and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

RES is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x1.12x0.83x0.54x3.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.41$18.50$10.70$8.16$10.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.90$4.51$3.08$4.18$0.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.0%+84.1%+61.5%+87.4%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.751.955.851.282.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.2M3.5M1.5M2.3M125K
Evenly matched — RES and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold", RES as "Hold", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -15.9% for RES (target: $6). For income investors, RES offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs LBRT's 1.04%.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$14.75$6.00$6.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts19306369
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises401
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33$0.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RES leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallRPC, Inc. (RES)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES vs NINE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (3480. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, RPC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +94. 1% versus ACDC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 493% more volatile than RES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPC, Inc. (RES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RES leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RES leads at 3. 5% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RES leads at 14. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, RPC, Inc.

(RES) trades at 34. 6x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3445. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE?

In this comparison, RES (2.

2% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PUMP, ACDC, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 2. 2% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RES: -36. 1%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LBRT and PUMP and ACDC and RES and NINE?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LBRT, RES pay a dividend while PUMP, ACDC, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RES

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LBRT and PUMP and ACDC and RES and NINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LBRT: 4.5% · PUMP: -24.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LBRT: 35.6x · PUMP: 1993.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.