Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LBTYK vs ATUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
LBTYK vs ATUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.00B | $539M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.88B | $8.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.14B | $-1.87B |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | -1.3% |
| Total Debt | $10.16B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.08B | $1.01B |
LBTYK vs ATUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LBTYK vs ATUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LBTYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- -27.6% 10Y total return vs ATUS's -88.0%
ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -21.8% margin vs LBTYK's -146.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ATUS's -4.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -21.8% margin vs LBTYK's -146.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs ATUS's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs ATUS's -28.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -28.2% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 0.1% vs -0.8% |
LBTYK vs ATUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LBTYK vs ATUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LBTYK and ATUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 1.8x LBTYK's $4.9B. ATUS is the more profitable business, keeping -21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBTYK's -146.3%. On growth, LBTYK holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7.1B | -$1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $783M | $163M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -146.3% | -21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATUS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATUS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LBTYK's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $539M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $25.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | -8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 7.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LBTYK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -58.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.2% | -156.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | -$762M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBTYK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBTYK five years ago would be worth $8,199 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $509 for ATUS. Over the past 12 months, LBTYK leads with a +24.1% total return vs ATUS's -28.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBTYK at 4.8% vs ATUS's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | -28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -37.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.0% | -94.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | -88.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
LBTYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LBTYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATUS's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBTYK currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs ATUS's 63.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.12 | $2.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.27 | $1.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +63.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 956K |
Analyst Outlook
ATUS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LBTYK as "Buy" and ATUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.3% upside for ATUS (target: $3) vs 6.2% for LBTYK (target: $13).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.67 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | 0.0% |
LBTYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ATUS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LBTYK vs ATUS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBTYK or ATUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS). Analysts rate Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LBTYK or ATUS?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) delivered a total return of -18.
0%, compared to -94. 9% for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBTYK returned -27. 6% versus ATUS's -88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LBTYK or ATUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Altice USA, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning ATUS is approximately 219% more volatile than LBTYK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LBTYK or ATUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -4. 1% for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liberty Global plc grew EPS -564. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1718. 2% for Altice USA, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LBTYK leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LBTYK or ATUS?
Altice USA, Inc.
(ATUS) is the more profitable company, earning -21. 8% net margin versus -146. 3% for Liberty Global plc — meaning it keeps -21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LBTYK leads at 0. 7% versus -1. 3% for ATUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATUS leads at 51. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LBTYK or ATUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LBTYK or ATUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57)). Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBTYK: -27. 6%, ATUS: -88. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LBTYK and ATUS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 189%
- Gross Margin > 15%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare LBTYK vs CHTR
CHTR is one of the most direct listed alternatives to LBTYK.
Compare ATUS vs CHTR
CHTR is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ATUS.
Expand With CHTR + CMCSA
CHTR and CMCSA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.