Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LBTYK vs WOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
LBTYK vs WOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.00B | $446M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.88B | $591M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.14B | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 1.2% |
| Total Debt | $10.16B | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.08B | $39M |
LBTYK vs WOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LBTYK vs WOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LBTYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- -27.6% 10Y total return vs WOW's -68.5%
WOW is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- -13.2% margin vs LBTYK's -146.3%
- -5.2% ROA vs LBTYK's -28.2%, ROIC 0.4% vs 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs WOW's -8.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.2% margin vs LBTYK's -146.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs WOW's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs WOW's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.2% ROA vs LBTYK's -28.2%, ROIC 0.4% vs 0.1% |
LBTYK vs WOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LBTYK vs WOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBTYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 8.3x WOW's $591M. WOW is the more profitable business, keeping -13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBTYK's -146.3%. On growth, LBTYK holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $591M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7.1B | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $783M | -$68M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +61.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -146.3% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | -11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -59.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WOW leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WOW's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LBTYK's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $446M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | -7.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 6.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WOW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WOW delivers a -52.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-53 in annual profit, vs $-58 for LBTYK. LBTYK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WOW's 4.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LBTYK scores 5/9 vs WOW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -58.3% | -52.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.2% | -5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 4.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.07x | 0.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBTYK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBTYK five years ago would be worth $8,199 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,270 for WOW. Over the past 12 months, LBTYK leads with a +24.1% total return vs WOW's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBTYK at 4.8% vs WOW's -14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.0% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | -68.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | -14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LBTYK and WOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LBTYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WOW's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WOW currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs LBTYK's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.12 | $5.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.27 | $3.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 573K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LBTYK as "Buy" and WOW as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +0.3% |
WOW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LBTYK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LBTYK vs WOW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBTYK or WOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW). Analysts rate Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LBTYK or WOW?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) delivered a total return of -18.
0%, compared to -67. 3% for WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBTYK returned -27. 6% versus WOW's -68. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LBTYK or WOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus WideOpenWest, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning WOW is approximately 53% more volatile than LBTYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 5% for WideOpenWest, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LBTYK or WOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -8. 1% for WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WideOpenWest, Inc. grew EPS 79. 6% year-over-year, compared to -564. 8% for Liberty Global plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LBTYK leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LBTYK or WOW?
WideOpenWest, Inc.
(WOW) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 3% net margin versus -146. 3% for Liberty Global plc — meaning it keeps -9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WOW leads at 1. 0% versus 0. 7% for LBTYK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOW leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LBTYK or WOW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LBTYK or WOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBTYK: -27. 6%, WOW: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LBTYK and WOW?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 189%
- Gross Margin > 15%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.