LDI vs UWMC

For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 37. 6% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate loanDepot, Inc. (LDI) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.

3x.

Over the past 5 years, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) delivered a total return of -23.

6%, compared to -89. 9% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UWMC returned -39. 9% versus LDI's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

50β versus loanDepot, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning LDI is approximately 41% more volatile than UWMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for loanDepot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.

8% versus 37. 6% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: loanDepot, Inc. grew EPS 43. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

9% net margin versus -4. 1% for loanDepot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus 13. 2% for LDI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LDI leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.

3x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for loanDepot, Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 71. 3% to $5. 98.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) offers the highest yield at 97. 1%, versus 0. 8% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (97.

1% yield). loanDepot, Inc. (LDI) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UWMC: -39. 9%, LDI: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.