Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LEDS vs LITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
LEDS vs LITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $17M | $64.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $2.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 110.1x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $521M |
LEDS vs LITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1232.2 | +1132.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEDS vs LITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEDS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.05
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 53.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.05, current ratio 0.99x
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 36.8% 10Y total return vs LEDS's 12.4%
- 17.7% margin vs LEDS's -3.0%
- +12.8% vs LEDS's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs LITE's 21.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs LEDS's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.05 vs LITE's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs LEDS's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs LEDS's -9.3%, ROIC -4.3% vs -24.9% |
LEDS vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LEDS vs LITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 56.2x LEDS's $44M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEDS's -3.0%. On growth, LEDS holds the edge at +103.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $425M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $399M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.7% | +90.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.7% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LEDS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $64.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $66.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.87x | 2441.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 110.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 869.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 39.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 55.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-64 for LEDS. LEDS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs LEDS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -64.0% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.9% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.3% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.44x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $521M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.59x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $111,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for LEDS. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs LEDS's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 166.2% vs LEDS's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | +134.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.7% | +1275.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | +1786.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | +1018.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +3680.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +166.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEDS and LITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEDS is the less volatile stock with a 2.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs LEDS's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.37 | $1021.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $63.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.2 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $918.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LITE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LEDS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LEDS vs LITE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEDS or LITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the stronger pick with 729.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 0% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) offers the better valuation at 2441. 7x trailing P/E (110. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LEDS or LITE?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +1019%, compared to -76. 1% for SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus LEDS's +12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LEDS or LITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
05β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning LITE is approximately 30% more volatile than LEDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 144% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LEDS or LITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is pulling ahead at 729.
8% versus 21. 0% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to 53. 1% for SemiLEDs Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LEDS or LITE?
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -2. 6% for SemiLEDs Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEDS leads at -3. 7% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LITE leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LEDS or LITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LEDS or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LITE: +36. 8%, LEDS: +12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LEDS and LITE?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.