Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Construction
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Security & Protection Services | Construction | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1.41B | $11.76B | $4.12B | $6.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.03B | $4.16B | $1.18B | $10.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $225M | $634M | $191M | $414M |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 45.0% | 39.2% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 20.6% | 22.1% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 15.6x | 24.0x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.66B | $2.28B | $229M | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $587M | $356M | $4M | $856M |
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leggett & Platt, In… (LEG) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.9%, current ratio 2.25x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.2x)
- 1.9% yield, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +15.3% vs TREX's -30.8%
ALLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 127.3% 10Y total return vs TREX's 239.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
TREX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 16.3% margin vs MHK's 3.8%
- 12.3% ROA vs MHK's 3.0%, ROIC 16.4% vs 3.9%
MHK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs LEG's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs MHK's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs LEG's 1.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs MHK's 3.0%, ROIC 16.4% vs 3.9% |
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories
LEG leads 1 • ALLE leads 1 • MHK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 9.3x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MHK's 3.8%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $4.2B | $1.2B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318M | $959M | $309M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $225M | $634M | $191M | $414M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $704M | $263M | $709M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +45.0% | +39.2% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +20.6% | +22.1% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +15.2% | +16.3% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +16.9% | +22.3% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +9.7% | +1.0% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | -7.0% | +3.6% | +65.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, LEG trades at a 72% valuation discount to TREX's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $11.8B | $4.1B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $13.7B | $4.3B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.10x | 18.39x | 22.00x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.56x | 15.60x | 23.95x | 11.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | 6.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.83x | 13.83x | 13.53x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 2.89x | 3.51x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 5.72x | 4.05x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.00x | 17.14x | 30.60x | 10.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $5 for MHK. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEG's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEG scores 7/9 vs MHK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.1% | +32.1% | +18.8% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +12.3% | +12.3% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +18.1% | +16.4% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +20.8% | +23.2% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 1.10x | 0.22x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.9B | $225M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $587M | $356M | $4M | $856M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.3B | $229M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 8.61x | — | 36.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALLE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALLE five years ago would be worth $10,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,779 for LEG. Over the past 12 months, LEG leads with a +15.3% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALLE at 9.9% vs LEG's -27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.8% | -14.6% | +9.3% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | -1.0% | -30.8% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.9% | +32.6% | -30.4% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.2% | +3.2% | -64.0% | -55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.6% | +127.3% | +239.9% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.5% | +9.9% | -11.4% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEG and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LEG's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEG currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.67x | 1.47x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.00 | $183.11 | $68.78 | $143.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.86 | $131.25 | $29.77 | $93.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +74.7% | +56.9% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 38.5 | 51.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 887K | 1.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LEG and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEG as "Hold", ALLE as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", MHK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, LEG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.88% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $172.50 | $44.50 | $130.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 23 | 31 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | $2.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +2.4% |
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LEG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LEG vs ALLE vs TREX vs MHK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
On trailing P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
Over the past 5 years, Allegion plc (ALLE) delivered a total return of +3.
2%, compared to -72. 2% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TREX returned +239. 9% versus LEG's -52. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's 1. 55β — meaning LEG is approximately 133% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 162% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -7. 5% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leggett & Platt, Incorporated grew EPS 145. 3% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 3. 4% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 4. 7% for MHK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK?
In this comparison, LEG (1.
9% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LEG or ALLE or TREX or MHK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LEG and ALLE and TREX and MHK?
These companies operate in different sectors (LEG (Consumer Cyclical) and ALLE (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LEG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock. LEG, ALLE pay a dividend while TREX, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.