LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-66.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LEG vs MHK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.+10.2%
LEG vs MHK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LEG | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1.41B | $6.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.03B | $10.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $225M | $414M |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.66B | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $587M | $856M |
LEG vs MHK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LEG
MHK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leggett & Platt, In… (LEG) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEG vs MHK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LEG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Mohawk Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
The Income Pick
LEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.9%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.2x)
- 7.4% margin vs MHK's 3.8%
Best for: income & stability
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.5%, EPS growth -27.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- -47.6% 10Y total return vs LEG's -52.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MHK | -0.5% revenue growth vs LEG's -7.5% |
| Value | LEG | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | LEG | 7.4% margin vs MHK's 3.8% |
| Stability / Safety | MHK | Beta 1.34 vs LEG's 1.55, lower leverage |
| Dividends | LEG | 1.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LEG | +15.3% vs MHK's +1.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LEG | 6.3% ROA vs MHK's 3.0%, ROIC 8.0% vs 3.9% |
LEG vs MHK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
LEG vs MHK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLEGLAGGINGMHK
MHKMohawk Industries, In…
1leads
LEGLeggett & Platt, Inco…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MHKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LEG5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LEG7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MHK4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LEG and MHK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 3.6x LEG's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.4% (LEG) to 3.8% (MHK). On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $225M | $414M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $709M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +65.2% |
Evenly matched — LEG and MHK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, LEG trades at a 65% valuation discount to MHK's 17.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LEG's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MHK's 7.0x.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.10x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.56x | 11.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.83x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.00x | 10.20x |
LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEG delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $5 for MHK. MHK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEG's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEG scores 7/9 vs MHK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.1% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $587M | $856M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 36.90x |
LEG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MHK five years ago would be worth $4,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,779 for LEG. Over the past 12 months, LEG leads with a +15.3% total return vs MHK's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHK at 0.9% vs LEG's -27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.8% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.9% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.2% | -55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.6% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.5% | +0.9% |
MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEG and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LEG's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEG currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs MHK's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.00 | $143.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.86 | $93.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 1.1M |
Evenly matched — LEG and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LEG as "Hold" and MHK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs 16.4% for LEG (target: $12). LEG is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LEGLeggett & Platt, … | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $130.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LEG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MHK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallLeggett & Platt, Incorporat… (LEG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LEG vs MHK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEG or MHK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LEG or MHK?
On trailing P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LEG or MHK?
Over the past 5 years, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) delivered a total return of -55. 3%, compared to -72. 2% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MHK returned -47. 6% versus LEG's -52. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LEG or MHK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's 1. 55β — meaning LEG is approximately 16% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 162% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LEG or MHK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -7. 5% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leggett & Platt, Incorporated grew EPS 145. 3% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHK leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LEG or MHK?
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus 3. 4% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEG leads at 5. 9% versus 4. 7% for MHK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MHK leads at 23. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LEG or MHK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LEG or MHK?
In this comparison, LEG (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MHK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LEG or MHK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEG: -52. 6%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LEG and MHK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LEG pays a dividend while MHK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LEG: -100.0% · MHK: 8.0%)Net Margin>
%
(LEG: 7.4% · MHK: 3.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(LEG: 6.1x · MHK: 17.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.