Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LEGN vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LEGN vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.28B | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-297M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Forward P/E | 116.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $414M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $902M | $147M |
LEGN vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 66.1 | -33.9% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEGN vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.77
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- -22.8% 10Y total return vs EDIT's -90.0%
EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs LEGN's -9.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs LEGN's -9.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -17.6% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
LEGN vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LEGN vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LEGN and EDIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$107M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$297M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$231M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.9% | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
LEGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.87x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 116.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.11x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.63x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGN delivers a -29.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-29 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. LEGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEGN scores 2/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.6% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$488M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $902M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $414M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LEGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LEGN five years ago would be worth $9,997 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $888 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +127.8% total return vs LEGN's -9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LEGN at -25.4% vs EDIT's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.2% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.0% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.4% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGN and EDIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDIT currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs LEGN's 63.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 2.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.30 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.24 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.1% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.4 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LEGN as "Buy" and EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.6% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs 65.0% for EDIT (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.89 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LEGN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LEGN vs EDIT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEGN or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Analysts rate Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LEGN or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) delivered a total return of -0.
0%, compared to -91. 1% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LEGN returned -24. 0% versus EDIT's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LEGN or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning EDIT is approximately 224% more volatile than LEGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 66% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LEGN or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Editas Medicine, Inc. grew EPS 37. 5% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Legend Biotech Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LEGN or EDIT?
Editas Medicine, Inc.
(EDIT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -28. 8% for Legend Biotech Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDIT leads at 0. 0% versus -13. 3% for LEGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGN leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LEGN or EDIT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 102.
6% to $57. 89.
07Which pays a better dividend — LEGN or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LEGN or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEGN: -24. 0%, EDIT: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LEGN and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.