Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LESL vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LESL vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $14M | $294M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-275M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.01B | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $40M |
LESL vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 196.7 | +96.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LESL vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LESL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.20
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 50.0% 10Y total return vs LESL's -99.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.7% vs LESL's -88.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.6% |
LESL vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LESL vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LESL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2.6x FLXS's $458M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$275M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.8% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LESL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LESL's 20.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $294M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $962M | $313M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | 15.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.27x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -42.4% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $948M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.06x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $12,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +79.7% total return vs LESL's -88.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.6% vs LESL's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.1% | +38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -88.4% | +79.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +241.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +22.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.9% | +50.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FLXS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLXS is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.20x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.56 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.2% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 132K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LESL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LESL vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LESL or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LESL or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +50. 0% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LESL or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 45% more volatile than FLXS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LESL or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LESL or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LESL leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LESL or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LESL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LESL or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +50. 0%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LESL and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while LESL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.