Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LFT vs RC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$61M
5Y Perf.-49.6%
RC
Ready Capital Corporation

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$357M
5Y Perf.-63.2%

LFT vs RC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LFT logoLFT
RC logoRC
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$61M$357M
Revenue (TTM)$61M$499M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-229M
Gross Margin69.4%-0.0%
Operating Margin76.1%-50.5%
Total Debt$0.00$5.86B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$248M

LFT vs RCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LFT
RC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Lument Finance Trus… (LFT)10050.4-49.6%
Ready Capital Corpo… (RC)10036.8-63.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LFT vs RC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LFT leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ready Capital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

LFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 30.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87
  • Beta 0.87, yield 30.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RC
Ready Capital Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
  • 6.1% 10Y total return vs LFT's -1.2%
  • 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRC logoRC17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsLFT logoLFT-12.2% margin vs RC's -45.8%
Stability / SafetyLFT logoLFTBeta 0.87 vs RC's 1.17
DividendsLFT logoLFT30.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4%
Momentum (1Y)RC logoRC-44.9% vs LFT's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LFT logoLFT-0.7% ROA vs RC's -2.6%

LFT vs RC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLFTLAGGINGRC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

RC is the larger business by revenue, generating $499M annually — 8.1x LFT's $61M. LFT is the more profitable business, keeping -12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$61M$499M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$47M-$249M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$229M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$303M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.4%-0.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+76.1%-50.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-12.2%-45.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+60.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.5%+24.9%
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
Market CapShares × price$61M$357M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$38M$6.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.29x-1.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple48.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.28x0.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.02x
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LFT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

LFT delivers a -3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RC scores 5/9 vs LFT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%-12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.7%-2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$23M$5.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$248M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$5.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.41x
LFT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LFT five years ago would be worth $6,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, RC leads with a -44.9% total return vs LFT's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFT at 5.9% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.4%+1.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.4%-44.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.8%-54.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.2%-44.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.2%+6.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.9%-23.1%
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.68$4.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.15$1.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.3%+45.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10032.964.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded128K2.1M
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs LFT's 30.16%.

MetricLFT logoLFTLument Finance Tr…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts16
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+30.2%+31.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.35$0.68
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+18.9%
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LFT leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallLument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LFT vs RC: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LFT or RC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.

0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — LFT or RC?

Over the past 5 years, Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

(LFT) delivered a total return of -30. 2%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RC returned +6. 1% versus LFT's -1. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — LFT or RC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

(LFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 35% more volatile than LFT relative to the S&P 500.

04

Which is growing faster — LFT or RC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.

0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ready Capital Corporation grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -141. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — LFT or RC?

Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

(LFT) is the more profitable company, earning -12. 2% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps -12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFT leads at 76. 1% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — LFT or RC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 30. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT).

07

Is LFT or RC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

(LFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 30. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LFT: -1. 2%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between LFT and RC?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LFT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 41%
  • Dividend Yield > 12.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 436%
  • Dividend Yield > 12.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LFT and RC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LFT: -100.0% · RC: 873.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.