Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LFUS vs TXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
LFUS vs TXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $11.11B | $263.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.49B | $18.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-40M | $5.37B |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 35.3% |
| Forward P/E | 33.8x | 38.3x |
| Total Debt | $946M | $15.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $3.23B |
LFUS vs TXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) | 100 | 271.8 | +171.8% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 243.8 | +143.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LFUS vs TXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LFUS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (33.8x vs 38.3x)
- +133.3% vs TXN's +83.2%
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs LFUS's 315.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs LFUS's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.8x vs 38.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs LFUS's -1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs LFUS's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs LFUS's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +133.3% vs TXN's +83.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs LFUS's -1.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.0% |
LFUS vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LFUS vs TXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 7.4x LFUS's $2.5B. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LFUS's -1.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$40M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $390M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +35.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +29.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.5% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.1% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LFUS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TXN's 34.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LFUS's 83.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.1B | $263.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.5B | $275.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -152.30x | 53.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.80x | 38.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 83.23x | 34.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.66x | 14.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.53x | 16.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.35x | 101.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LFUS. LFUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs LFUS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | +32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $383M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $946M | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.93x | 12.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LFUS and TXN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LFUS five years ago would be worth $17,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,090 for TXN. Over the past 12 months, LFUS leads with a +133.3% total return vs TXN's +83.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 23.0% vs LFUS's 20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +64.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +133.3% | +83.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.4% | +86.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +315.2% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LFUS's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs LFUS's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $475.00 | $292.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $188.08 | $152.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 77.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 266K | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LFUS as "Buy" and TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -9.4% upside for LFUS (target: $400) vs -12.3% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs LFUS's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $400.00 | $253.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.89 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.6% |
TXN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LFUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LFUS vs TXN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LFUS or TXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 53. 1x trailing P/E (38. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LFUS or TXN?
On forward P/E, Littelfuse, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 33. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LFUS or TXN?
Over the past 5 years, Littelfuse, Inc.
(LFUS) delivered a total return of +75. 7%, compared to +70. 9% for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXN returned +476. 1% versus LFUS's +315. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LFUS or TXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Littelfuse, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning LFUS is approximately 59% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LFUS or TXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus 8. 9% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Instruments Incorporated grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -172. 5% for Littelfuse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LFUS leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LFUS or TXN?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus -3. 0% for Littelfuse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 1. 6% for LFUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LFUS or TXN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Littelfuse, Inc.
(LFUS) trades at 33. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for Texas Instruments Incorporated — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LFUS: -9. 4% to $400. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LFUS or TXN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS).
09Is LFUS or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +476. 1% 10Y return). Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 1%, LFUS: +315. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LFUS and TXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.