LFUS vs VICR

For growth investors, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the stronger pick with 13.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 107. 4x trailing P/E (101. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Littelfuse, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 33. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +226.

0%, compared to +75. 7% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +29. 5% versus LFUS's +315. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 76β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 59% more volatile than LFUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 39% for Littelfuse, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is pulling ahead at 13.

5% versus 8. 9% for Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -172. 5% for Littelfuse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VICR leads at 0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus -3. 0% for Littelfuse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICR leads at 9. 0% versus 1. 6% for LFUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) trades at 33. 8x forward P/E versus 101. 2x for Vicor Corporation — 67. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LFUS: -9. 4% to $400. 00.

In this comparison, LFUS (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +315. 2% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LFUS: +315. 2%, VICR: +29. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LFUS pays a dividend while VICR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.