Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $38M | $4.08B | $53.62B | $11.57B | $262.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $446M | $4.37B | $453M | $18.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $917K | $17M | $-97M | $119M | $5.37B |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 53.9% | 55.4% | 57.3% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 18.1% | 35.3% |
| Forward P/E | 90.0x | 58.7x | 63.2x | 92.5x | 38.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $5.67B | $13M | $15.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $59M | $772M | $403M | $3.23B |
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 420.6 | +320.6% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 54.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 47.17x
- 28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- Beta 0.33 vs VICR's 2.87
POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VICR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs TXN's 476.4%
- +5.2% vs LGL's +4.2%
- 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8%
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- Lower P/E (38.1x vs 92.5x)
- 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.1x vs 92.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs VICR's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs LGL's +4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8% |
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories
VICR leads 1 • LGL leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 5037.7x LGL's $4M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $446M | $4.4B | $453M | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$51,000 | $41M | $881M | $103M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $917,000 | $17M | -$97M | $119M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $408,000 | $85M | $820M | $119M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +53.9% | +55.4% | +57.3% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +4.6% | +4.1% | +18.1% | +35.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +3.7% | -2.2% | +26.2% | +29.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +18.9% | +18.8% | +26.3% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.9% | +2.6% | +15.6% | +11.5% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | -60.0% | +164.2% | +3.4% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.8x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 72% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXN's 34.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VICR's 194.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $4.1B | $53.6B | $11.6B | $262.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $4.0B | $58.5B | $11.2B | $274.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.97x | 187.90x | -9999.00x | 98.26x | 52.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 58.74x | 63.20x | 92.55x | 38.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 81.32x | 55.92x | 194.00x | 34.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.00x | 9.20x | 12.18x | 28.37x | 14.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 6.13x | 7.52x | 16.19x | 16.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.30x | 46.85x | 69.45x | 97.02x | 100.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +2.4% | -1.4% | +18.7% | +32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +2.1% | -0.7% | +16.6% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.4% | +1.8% | +8.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +2.9% | +2.1% | +5.7% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.80x | 0.02x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$59M | $4.9B | -$390M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $59M | $772M | $403M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $5.7B | $13M | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.78x | — | 12.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $31,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,738 for LGL. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs LGL's +4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 81.4% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.9% | +97.0% | +53.1% | +119.5% | +63.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.2% | +43.3% | +105.4% | +524.2% | +77.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | -4.5% | +40.6% | +496.6% | +85.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -1.3% | +48.7% | +218.0% | +72.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.4% | +239.0% | +363.4% | +2651.8% | +476.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | -1.5% | +12.0% | +81.4% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs LGL's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.11x | 1.69x | 2.87x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.74 | $81.59 | $105.91 | $293.95 | $292.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.45 | $30.86 | $48.52 | $40.54 | $152.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +89.8% | +93.6% | +87.2% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 61.3 | 78.9 | 59.9 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 982K | 9.1M | 860K | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.9% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.90% vs POWI's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.00 | $106.35 | $245.00 | $253.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 46 | 7 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +1.8% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 | $1.82 | — | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.6% |
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VICR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 8x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.
8x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated is actually cheaper at 38. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +218.
0%, compared to -42. 6% for The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus LGL's +115. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 764% more volatile than LGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGL leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus -61. 4% for LGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) trades at 38.
1x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 54. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LGL, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, VICR: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGL and POWI and MCHP and VICR and TXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, MCHP, TXN pay a dividend while LGL, VICR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.