Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LGL
The LGL Group, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-18.6%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.+35.3%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.62B
5Y Perf.+106.4%
VICR
Vicor Corporation

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.57B
5Y Perf.+320.6%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$262.15B
5Y Perf.+142.5%

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LGL logoLGL
POWI logoPOWI
MCHP logoMCHP
VICR logoVICR
TXN logoTXN
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$38M$4.08B$53.62B$11.57B$262.15B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$446M$4.37B$453M$18.44B
Net Income (TTM)$917K$17M$-97M$119M$5.37B
Gross Margin72.1%53.9%55.4%57.3%57.3%
Operating Margin-2.0%4.6%4.1%18.1%35.3%
Forward P/E90.0x58.7x63.2x92.5x38.1x
Total Debt$0.00$0.00$5.67B$13M$15.39B
Cash & Equiv.$42M$59M$772M$403M$3.23B

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LGL
POWI
MCHP
VICR
TXN
StockMay 20May 26Return
The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL)10081.4-18.6%
Power Integrations,… (POWI)100135.3+35.3%
Microchip Technolog… (MCHP)100206.4+106.4%
Vicor Corporation (VICR)100420.6+320.6%
Texas Instruments I… (TXN)100242.5+142.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TXN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. The LGL Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. VICR also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LGL
The LGL Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 54.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 47.17x
  • 28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
  • Beta 0.33 vs VICR's 2.87
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Technology Pick

POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
VICR
Vicor Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

VICR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 26.5% 10Y total return vs TXN's 476.4%
  • +5.2% vs LGL's +4.2%
  • 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
The Income Pick

TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
  • Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
  • Lower P/E (38.1x vs 92.5x)
  • 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLGL logoLGL28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
ValueTXN logoTXNLower P/E (38.1x vs 92.5x)
Quality / MarginsTXN logoTXN29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
Stability / SafetyLGL logoLGLBeta 0.33 vs VICR's 2.87
DividendsTXN logoTXN1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)VICR logoVICR+5.2% vs LGL's +4.2%
Efficiency (ROA)VICR logoVICR16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8%

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LGLThe LGL Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Electronic Instruments
100.0%$2M
POWIPower Integrations, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MCHPMicrochip Technology Incorporated
FY 2025
Semiconductor Products Member
97.0%$4.3B
Technology Licensing Member
3.0%$131M
VICRVicor Corporation
FY 2025
AdvancedProducts
61.0%$249M
BrickProducts
39.0%$159M
TXNTexas Instruments Incorporated
FY 2025
Analog
83.9%$14.0B
Embedded Processing
16.1%$2.7B

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTXNLAGGINGMCHP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 5037.7x LGL's $4M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$446M$4.4B$453M$18.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$51,000$41M$881M$103M$8.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$917,000$17M-$97M$119M$5.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$408,000$85M$820M$119M$3.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.1%+53.9%+55.4%+57.3%+57.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.0%+4.6%+4.1%+18.1%+35.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.1%+3.7%-2.2%+26.2%+29.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.1%+18.9%+18.8%+26.3%+20.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-43.9%+2.6%+15.6%+11.5%+18.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%-60.0%+164.2%+3.4%+32.0%
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 52.8x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 72% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXN's 34.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VICR's 194.0x.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
Market CapShares × price$38M$4.1B$53.6B$11.6B$262.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$4.0B$58.5B$11.2B$274.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS89.97x187.90x-9999.00x98.26x52.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.58.74x63.20x92.55x38.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple81.32x55.92x194.00x34.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue17.00x9.20x12.18x28.37x14.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.94x6.13x7.52x16.19x16.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.30x46.85x69.45x97.02x100.71x
Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.2%+2.4%-1.4%+18.7%+32.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+2.1%-0.7%+16.6%+15.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+1.8%+8.9%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.3%+2.9%+2.1%+5.7%+19.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x0.02x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$42M-$59M$4.9B-$390M$12.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$42M$59M$772M$403M$3.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$0$5.7B$13M$15.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.78x12.06x
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $31,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,738 for LGL. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs LGL's +4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 81.4% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.9%+97.0%+53.1%+119.5%+63.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.2%+43.3%+105.4%+524.2%+77.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%-4.5%+40.6%+496.6%+85.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.6%-1.3%+48.7%+218.0%+72.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.4%+239.0%+363.4%+2651.8%+476.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.7%-1.5%+12.0%+81.4%+22.8%
VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs LGL's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.33x2.11x1.69x2.87x1.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.74$81.59$105.91$293.95$292.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.45$30.86$48.52$40.54$152.73
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.9%+89.8%+93.6%+87.2%+98.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.961.378.959.975.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K982K9.1M860K6.7M
Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.9% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.90% vs POWI's 1.14%.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationTXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$79.00$106.35$245.00$253.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts1646765
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+1.8%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0185022
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84$1.82$5.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.4%+0.2%+0.3%+0.6%
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VICR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallTexas Instruments Incorpora… (TXN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LGL vs POWI vs MCHP vs VICR vs TXN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 8x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.

8x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated is actually cheaper at 38. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +218.

0%, compared to -42. 6% for The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus LGL's +115. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 764% more volatile than LGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGL leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus -61. 4% for LGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) trades at 38.

1x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 54. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN?

In this comparison, TXN (1.

9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LGL, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LGL or POWI or MCHP or VICR or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, VICR: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LGL and POWI and MCHP and VICR and TXN?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, MCHP, TXN pay a dividend while LGL, VICR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCHP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VICR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LGL and POWI and MCHP and VICR and TXN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LGL: -43.9% · POWI: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(LGL: 25.1% · POWI: 3.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LGL: 90.0x · POWI: 187.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.