Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $39M | $3.52B | $25.84B | $4.00B | $8.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $655M | $1.07B | $446M | $4.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $917K | $23M | $177M | $17M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 38.6% | 55.3% | 53.9% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 2.9% | 16.0% | 4.6% | -1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 91.9x | 34.5x | 76.9x | 55.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $258M | $538M | $0.00 | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $163M | $112M | $59M | $1.61B |
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL) | 100 | 83.1 | -16.9% |
| Veeco Instruments I… (VECO) | 100 | 491.7 | +391.7% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.36
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 54.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 47.17x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 47.17x
VECO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
MTSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs VECO's 239.9%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs VECO's -7.4%
- 8.6% ROA vs VSAT's -3.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs -0.7%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
VSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.1% vs LGL's +2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs VECO's -7.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs VSAT's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs VSAT's 2.92 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs LGL's +2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs VSAT's -3.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs -0.7% |
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
LGL leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • VECO leads 0 • VSAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 1261.2x LGL's $4M. LGL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSAT's -4.0%. On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $655M | $1.1B | $446M | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$51,000 | $39M | $210M | $41M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $917,000 | $23M | $177M | $17M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $408,000 | $43M | $168M | $85M | $907M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +38.6% | +55.3% | +53.9% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +2.9% | +16.0% | +4.6% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +3.5% | +16.5% | +3.7% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +6.5% | +15.6% | +18.9% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.9% | -5.4% | +22.5% | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | -105.0% | +42.9% | -60.0% | +173.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGL and VSAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 91.9x trailing earnings, LGL trades at a 50% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VSAT's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 136.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $3.5B | $25.8B | $4.0B | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $3.6B | $26.3B | $3.9B | $14.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 91.90x | 97.83x | -471.88x | 184.18x | -14.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.52x | 76.91x | 55.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 93.12x | 136.13x | 79.69x | 11.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.37x | 5.30x | 26.71x | 9.02x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 3.95x | 19.20x | 6.01x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.23x | 77.08x | 134.01x | 45.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-4 for VSAT. VECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSAT's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VECO scores 6/9 vs VSAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +2.6% | +13.2% | +2.4% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +1.8% | +8.6% | +2.1% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.8% | +6.0% | +2.4% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +3.2% | +7.6% | +2.9% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.29x | 0.41x | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $94M | $426M | -$59M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $163M | $112M | $59M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $258M | $538M | $0 | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.64x | 391.47x | — | 6.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,474 for LGL. Over the past 12 months, VSAT leads with a +614.8% total return vs LGL's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | +89.0% | +96.9% | +93.2% | +76.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.6% | +205.6% | +203.8% | +44.4% | +614.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.1% | +199.8% | +526.9% | -6.3% | +80.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +154.6% | +513.6% | -8.3% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +239.9% | +795.9% | +232.7% | -12.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | +44.2% | +84.4% | -2.2% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGL and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSAT's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs LGL's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.97x | 1.75x | 2.08x | 2.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.74 | $64.97 | $355.00 | $78.94 | $68.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.45 | $18.31 | $110.09 | $30.86 | $8.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +88.8% | +97.0% | +91.0% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 82.2 | 71.3 | 76.1 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 1.3M | 1.1M | 967K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VECO as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", VSAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -39.8% for VECO (target: $35). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.75 | $254.00 | $79.00 | $57.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 23 | 16 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +2.5% | +0.1% |
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LGL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LGL vs VECO vs MTSI vs POWI vs VSAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO). The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL) offers the better valuation at 91. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
On trailing P/E, The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the cheapest at 91. 9x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Veeco Instruments Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to -35. 3% for The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +795. 9% versus VSAT's -12. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 702% more volatile than LGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 162% for Viasat, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -7. 4% for Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The LGL Group, Inc. grew EPS 54. 7% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSAT leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for Viasat, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -61. 4% for LGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Veeco Instruments Inc.
(VECO) trades at 34. 5x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 42. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LGL, VECO, MTSI, VSAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGL or VECO or MTSI or POWI or VSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), +120. 0% 10Y return). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGL: +120. 0%, VSAT: -12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGL and VECO and MTSI and POWI and VSAT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; VECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VSAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while LGL, VECO, MTSI, VSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.