LGN vs MYRG

For growth investors, Legence Corp.

Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) offers the better valuation at 60. 4x trailing P/E (46. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the cheapest at 60. 4x versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock at 1070. 8x. On forward P/E, MYR Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 46. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) delivered a total return of +449. 7%, compared to +235. 3% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1794% versus LGN's +235. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock's 2. 49β — meaning LGN is approximately 47% more volatile than MYRG relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legence Corp.

Class A Common stock (LGN) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 121. 2% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 0. 5% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MYRG leads at 4. 4% versus 2. 8% for LGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGN leads at 20. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) trades at 46. 8x forward P/E versus 102. 6x for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — 55. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MYRG: -20. 4% to $362. 00.

In this comparison, LGN (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. MYRG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1794% 10Y return). Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1794%, LGN: +235. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LGN pays a dividend while MYRG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.