Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGN vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
LGN vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $4.77B | $601.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 102.6x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.70B | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $24.81B |
Quick Verdict: LGN vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.49, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 121.2%
- 235.3% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 102.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 102.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.49 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +235.3% vs SPIR's +93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs -0.1% |
LGN vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 29.3x SPIR's $72M. LGN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGN and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 99% valuation discount to LGN's 1070.8x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $601.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $585.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1070.79x | 11.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 102.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 8406.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 465.26x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGN scores 7/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.29x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LGN and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGN five years ago would be worth $33,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, LGN leads with a +235.3% total return vs SPIR's +93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs LGN's 49.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +128.9% | +134.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +235.3% | +93.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +238.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | -75.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.7% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
LGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGN is the less volatile stock with a 2.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.29 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.96 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.5 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LGN as "Buy" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -5.7% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -27.9% for LGN (target: $74). LGN is the only dividend payer here at 2.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.75 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.96 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LGN vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGN or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGN or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock at 1070. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGN or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) delivered a total return of +235. 3%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGN returned +235. 3% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGN or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 49β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 18% more volatile than LGN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LGN or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 121. 2% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGN or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 0. 5% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGN leads at 2. 8% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGN or SPIR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPIR: -5.
7% to $17. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGN or SPIR?
In this comparison, LGN (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGN or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 9% yield, +235. 3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGN: +235. 3%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGN and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. LGN pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.