Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGVN vs BCLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LGVN vs BCLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $20M | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $849K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | 61.5% |
| Operating Margin | -19.4% | -14.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $824K | $720K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $187K |
LGVN vs BCLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longeveron Inc. (LGVN) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGVN vs BCLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 1.33x
BCLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 147.5%, EPS growth 148.9%
- -97.8% 10Y total return vs LGVN's -98.9%
- 147.5% revenue growth vs LGVN's -49.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 147.5% revenue growth vs LGVN's -49.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.5% margin vs LGVN's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs BCLI's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -42.7% vs LGVN's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -143.2% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1% |
LGVN vs BCLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCLI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGVN and BCLI operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $849,000 in trailing revenue. BCLI is the more profitable business, keeping -13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGVN's -18.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $849,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +61.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | -14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | -11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGVN and BCLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.66x | 0.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.56x | 8.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LGVN and BCLI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCLI scores 4/9 vs LGVN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -199.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -143.2% | -4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $533,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $187,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824,000 | $720,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -26.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGVN five years ago would be worth $152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, BCLI leads with a -42.7% total return vs LGVN's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGVN at -70.0% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.6% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.8% | -42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.0% | -74.9% |
Risk & Volatility
LGVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCLI's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGVN currently trades 47.3% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.80 | $1.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $0.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +36.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 9K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). BCLI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LGVN vs BCLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGVN or BCLI a better buy right now?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGVN or BCLI?
Over the past 5 years, Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) delivered a total return of -98. 5%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCLI returned -97. 8% versus LGVN's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGVN or BCLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning BCLI is approximately 18% more volatile than LGVN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LGVN or BCLI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to -20. 6% for Longeveron Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGVN or BCLI?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -1893. 6% for Longeveron Inc. — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCLI leads at -1377. 3% versus -1942. 2% for LGVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCLI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGVN or BCLI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGVN or BCLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGVN: -98. 9%, BCLI: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGVN and BCLI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.