Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BCLI vs CLLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BCLI vs CLLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $279M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $849K | $75M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-35M |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | -14.0% | -35.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $720K | $91M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187K | $143M |
BCLI vs CLLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCLI vs CLLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCLI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.05
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, current ratio 0.04x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 0.04x
CLLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 54.0%, EPS growth 76.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- -88.5% 10Y total return vs BCLI's -97.8%
- 54.0% revenue growth vs BCLI's 147.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.0% revenue growth vs BCLI's 147.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -47.0% margin vs BCLI's -13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs CLLS's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +151.6% vs BCLI's -42.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.8% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1% |
BCLI vs CLLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCLI vs CLLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLLS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $75M annually — 88.7x BCLI's $849,000. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -47.0% (CLLS) to -13.5% (BCLI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $849,000 | $75M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.5% | +87.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -35.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -47.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -43.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +117.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.0% | +102.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CLLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $279M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $228M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -9.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.31x | 6.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLLS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLLS scores 7/9 vs BCLI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -9.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -79.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -30.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $533,000 | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187,000 | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $720,000 | $91M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.44x | -3.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLLS five years ago would be worth $2,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $154 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, CLLS leads with a +151.6% total return vs BCLI's -42.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLLS at 26.5% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.9% | +151.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +102.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.9% | +26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCLI and CLLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLLS's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLLS currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $5.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $1.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.3% | +70.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 42K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLLS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BCLI vs CLLS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCLI or CLLS a better buy right now?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellectis S. A. (CLLS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCLI or CLLS?
Over the past 5 years, Cellectis S.
A. (CLLS) delivered a total return of -74. 3%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLLS returned -88. 5% versus BCLI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCLI or CLLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Cellectis S. A. 's 1. 73β — meaning CLLS is approximately 65% more volatile than BCLI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BCLI or CLLS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to 76. 8% for Cellectis S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCLI or CLLS?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -88. 6% for Cellectis S. A. — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLLS leads at -143. 5% versus -1377. 3% for BCLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCLI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BCLI or CLLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BCLI or CLLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Cellectis S. A. (CLLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCLI: -97. 8%, CLLS: -88. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BCLI and CLLS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.