Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LHX logo
LHX
CAT logo
CAT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LHX vs CAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$55.07B
5Y Perf.+73.8%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$458.69B
5Y Perf.+679.3%

LHX vs CAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LHX logoLHX
CAT logoCAT
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAgricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$55.07B$458.69B
Revenue (TTM)$22.48B$70.75B
Net Income (TTM)$1.73B$9.42B
Gross Margin24.5%32.5%
Operating Margin10.0%16.6%
Forward P/E25.4x40.0x
Total Debt$10.44B$43.33B
Cash & Equiv.$1.07B$9.98B

LHX vs CATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LHX
CAT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
L3Harris Technologi… (LHX)100173.8+73.8%
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)100779.3+679.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LHX vs CAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CAT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇CAT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

LHX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 1.6%
  • Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 53.2%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 12.5% 10Y total return vs LHX's 299.1%
  • PEG 1.42 vs LHX's 2.42
  • 4.3% revenue growth vs LHX's 2.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCAT logoCAT4.3% revenue growth vs LHX's 2.5%
ValueLHX logoLHXLower P/E (25.4x vs 40.0x)
Quality / MarginsCAT logoCAT13.3% margin vs LHX's 7.7%
Stability / SafetyLHX logoLHXBeta 0.38 vs CAT's 1.64, lower leverage
DividendsLHX logoLHX1.6% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)CAT logoCAT+175.7% vs LHX's +20.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CAT logoCAT10.0% ROA vs LHX's 4.2%, ROIC 15.9% vs 5.4%

LHX vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
LHXL3Harris Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Space and Airborne Systems
31.4%$6.9B
Integrated Mission Systems
30.0%$6.6B
Communication Systems
25.7%$5.7B
Aerojet Rocketdyne Segment
12.9%$2.8B
CATCaterpillar Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Subsegments
66.6%$74.0B
Construction Industries
22.6%$25.1B
Resource Industries
11.2%$12.5B
Financial Products
3.8%$4.2B
Other Segments
0.3%$327M
Power & Energy
-4.6%$-5,058,000,000

LHX vs CAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCATLAGGINGLHX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 3.1x LHX's $22.5B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LHX's 7.7%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$22.5B$70.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.3B$14.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.7B$9.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.6B$11.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.0%+16.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.7%+13.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.5%+16.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%+22.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.3%+30.2%
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LHX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 34.6x trailing earnings, LHX trades at a 34% valuation discount to CAT's 52.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.86x vs LHX's 3.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Market CapShares × price$55.1B$458.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$64.4B$492.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.56x52.35x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.36x39.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.29x1.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.85x36.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.52x6.79x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.83x21.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.53x44.65x
LHX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $9 for LHX. LHX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LHX scores 9/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.9%+47.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.2%+10.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+15.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.4%+19.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x2.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.4B$33.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$10.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.4B$43.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.41x9.22x
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $48,451 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,523 for LHX. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +175.7% total return vs LHX's +20.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 60.8% vs LHX's 16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.4%+65.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.5%+175.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.2%+315.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.2%+384.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+299.1%+1247.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.5%+60.8%
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LHX and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LHX is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs LHX's 77.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.38x1.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$379.23$994.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$243.84$356.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.7%+99.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.861.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M2.5M
Evenly matched — LHX and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LHX and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LHX as "Buy" and CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.8% upside for LHX (target: $347) vs -10.5% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, LHX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.63% vs CAT's 0.59%.

MetricLHX logoLHXL3Harris Technolo…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$347.33$882.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts3253
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2432
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.79$5.86
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.1%+1.1%
Evenly matched — LHX and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LHX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCaterpillar Inc. (CAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LHX vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LHX or CAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) offers the better valuation at 34. 6x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LHX or CAT?

On trailing P/E, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the cheapest at 34. 6x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 42x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 42x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LHX or CAT?

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +384. 5%, compared to +45. 2% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1247% versus LHX's +299. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LHX or CAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning CAT is approximately 326% more volatile than LHX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LHX or CAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LHX leads at 8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LHX or CAT?

Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 7. 3% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAT leads at 16. 6% versus 10. 0% for LHX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAT leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LHX or CAT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 42x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) trades at 25. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LHX: 17. 8% to $347. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LHX or CAT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).

09

Is LHX or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 6% yield, +299. 1% 10Y return). Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LHX: +299. 1%, CAT: +1247%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LHX and CAT?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.