Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LIEN vs SUNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
LIEN vs SUNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $206M | $102M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $26M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 77.3% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 63.6% | 53.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.2x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $25.00B | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.93B | $6M |
LIEN vs SUNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Atlantic BD… (LIEN) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIEN vs SUNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 202.2%, EPS growth 57.0%
- -6.2% 10Y total return vs SUNS's -11.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 0.24x
SUNS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 15.4%
- 15.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LIEN's 1.1%
- 4.6% ROA vs LIEN's 0.0%, ROIC 6.0% vs 0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 202.2% NII/revenue growth vs SUNS's 148.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 6.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 61.3% margin vs SUNS's 46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SUNS's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LIEN's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs SUNS's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs LIEN's 0.0%, ROIC 6.0% vs 0.0% |
LIEN vs SUNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $54M annually — 2.1x SUNS's $26M. LIEN is the more profitable business, keeping 61.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUNS's 46.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $26M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.3% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +53.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -377.1% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +108.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.5% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LIEN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, LIEN trades at a 23% valuation discount to SUNS's 8.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SUNS's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIEN's 645.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $206M | $102M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.3B | $218M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.17x | 8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.17x | 6.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 644.99x | 12.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.79x | 3.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $0 for LIEN. LIEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUNS's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SUNS scores 3/9 vs LIEN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22.1B | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.9B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25.0B | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.63x | 3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIEN five years ago would be worth $9,379 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,873 for SUNS. Over the past 12 months, LIEN leads with a +2.7% total return vs SUNS's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIEN at 15.1% vs SUNS's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.5% | -11.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | -11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | -11.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.1% | -3.9% |
Risk & Volatility
LIEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUNS's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIEN currently trades 78.8% from its 52-week high vs SUNS's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.44 | $11.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.01 | $7.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +64.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 105K |
Analyst Outlook
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.41% vs LIEN's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +15.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SUNS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LIEN leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
LIEN vs SUNS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIEN or SUNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is the stronger pick with 202. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 148. 1% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIEN or SUNS?
On trailing P/E, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. at 8. 0x. On forward P/E, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIEN or SUNS?
Over the past 5 years, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) delivered a total return of -6. 2%, compared to -11. 3% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIEN returned -6. 2% versus SUNS's -11. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIEN or SUNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning SUNS is approximately 632% more volatile than LIEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 67% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIEN or SUNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is pulling ahead at 202. 2% versus 148. 1% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. grew EPS 57. 0% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIEN or SUNS?
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is the more profitable company, earning 61. 3% net margin versus 46. 0% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 61. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUNS leads at 64. 2% versus 63. 6% for LIEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIEN or SUNS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 6. 5x for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIEN or SUNS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the highest yield at 15. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN).
09Is LIEN or SUNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.
(LIEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIEN: -6. 2%, SUNS: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIEN and SUNS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIEN (Financial Services) and SUNS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.