Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LINK vs NEXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
LINK vs NEXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $58M | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-306M |
| Gross Margin | 38.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $817K | $8.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $144M |
LINK vs NEXT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interlink Electroni… (LINK) | 100 | 149.2 | +49.2% |
| NextDecade Corporat… (NEXT) | 100 | 504.6 | +404.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LINK vs NEXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LINK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 1.8%, EPS growth 45.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.6%
- 0.8% 10Y total return vs NEXT's -23.0%
NEXT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- -1.4% margin vs LINK's -13.6%
- +2.7% vs LINK's -3.6%
- -3.3% ROA vs LINK's -13.2%, ROIC -2.1% vs -17.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.8% revenue growth vs NEXT's -429.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.4% margin vs LINK's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (8.9% vs 376.2%) | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs LINK's -3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.3% ROA vs LINK's -13.2%, ROIC -2.1% vs -17.2% |
LINK vs NEXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LINK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LINK and NEXT operate at a comparable scale, with $12M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$919,000 | -$211M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$168,000 | -$5.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.7% | -172.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LINK and NEXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.46x | -6.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.90x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.99x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LINK and NEXT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEXT delivers a -15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-17 for LINK. LINK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEXT's 3.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LINK scores 4/9 vs NEXT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.7% | -15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.2% | -2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.8% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 3.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $144M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $817,000 | $8.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEXT five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,560 for LINK. Over the past 12 months, NEXT leads with a +2.7% total return vs LINK's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEXT at 8.9% vs LINK's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.6% | +41.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.6% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +29.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | +275.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | -23.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
NEXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEXT is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LINK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEXT currently trades 62.9% from its 52-week high vs LINK's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.10 | $12.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.66 | $4.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.6% | +62.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
LINK is the only dividend payer here at 0.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NEXT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). LINK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LINK vs NEXT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LINK or NEXT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LINK or NEXT?
Over the past 5 years, NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to -34. 4% for Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LINK returned +0. 8% versus NEXT's -23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LINK or NEXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Interlink Electronics, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning LINK is approximately -829% more volatile than NEXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interlink Electronics, Inc. (LINK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 4% for NextDecade Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LINK or NEXT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Interlink Electronics, Inc.
grew EPS 45. 8% year-over-year, compared to -387. 5% for NextDecade Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LINK or NEXT?
NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -13. 6% for Interlink Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEXT leads at 0. 0% versus -15. 4% for LINK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LINK leads at 38. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LINK or NEXT?
In this comparison, LINK (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. NEXT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LINK or NEXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEXT: -23. 0%, LINK: +0. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LINK and NEXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (LINK (Technology) and NEXT (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
LINK pays a dividend while NEXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.