Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LINK
Interlink Electronics, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$56M
5Y Perf.-8.0%
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$332M
5Y Perf.-80.8%
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.03B
5Y Perf.-8.4%
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$205M
5Y Perf.-96.0%
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$734M
5Y Perf.-67.1%

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LINK logoLINK
NNDM logoNNDM
XMTR logoXMTR
MVIS logoMVIS
SSYS logoSSYS
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsComputer HardwareIndustrial - MachineryHardware, Equipment & PartsComputer Hardware
Market Cap$56M$332M$4.03B$205M$734M
Revenue (TTM)$12M$118M$741M$1M$548M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-338M$-52M$-95M$-115M
Gross Margin38.9%34.5%39.3%-14.4%43.1%
Operating Margin-15.4%-91.4%-4.8%-57.4%-13.9%
Forward P/E158.0x116.6x72.5x
Total Debt$817K$9M$349M$37M$27M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$205M$15M$32M$95M

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LINK
NNDM
XMTR
MVIS
SSYS
StockJun 21May 26Return
Interlink Electroni… (LINK)10092.0-8.0%
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM)10019.2-80.8%
Xometry, Inc. (XMTR)10091.6-8.4%
MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS)1004.0-96.0%
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS)10032.9-67.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XMTR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Interlink Electronics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. NNDM and SSYS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LINK
Interlink Electronics, Inc.
The Income Pick

LINK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 0.6%
  • -3.0% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -8.4%
  • Beta 1.15, yield 0.6%, current ratio 3.79x
  • Beta 1.15 vs MVIS's 2.66, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
The Growth Play

NNDM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 77.3%, EPS growth -211.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 10.02x
  • 77.3% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

XMTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • -7.0% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
  • +161.7% vs MVIS's -41.9%
  • -7.3% ROA vs MVIS's -74.3%, ROIC -5.7% vs -98.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MVIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
The Value Play

SSYS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNNDM logoNNDM77.3% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
ValueSSYS logoSSYSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsXMTR logoXMTR-7.0% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
Stability / SafetyLINK logoLINKBeta 1.15 vs MVIS's 2.66, lower leverage
DividendsLINK logoLINK0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)XMTR logoXMTR+161.7% vs MVIS's -41.9%
Efficiency (ROA)XMTR logoXMTR-7.3% ROA vs MVIS's -74.3%, ROIC -5.7% vs -98.3%

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LINKInterlink Electronics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
78.5%$80M
Service
21.5%$22M
XMTRXometry, Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
91.7%$630M
Service
8.3%$57M
MVISMicroVision, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Revenue
50.5%$610,000
License and Royalty Revenue
45.5%$550,000
Contract Revenue
4.0%$48,000
SSYSStratasys Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
69.0%$380M
Services Member
31.0%$171M

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXMTRLAGGINGMVIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NNDM and XMTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

XMTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $741M annually — 613.2x MVIS's $1M. XMTR is the more profitable business, keeping -7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, NNDM holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12M$118M$741M$1M$548M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$919,000-$89M-$21M-$64M-$44M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$338M-$52M-$95M-$115M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$168,000-$89M-$11M-$59M-$10M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.9%+34.5%+39.3%-14.4%+43.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.4%-91.4%-4.8%-57.4%-13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%-2.9%-7.0%-78.6%-21.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.4%-75.7%-1.4%-49.2%-1.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.5%+106.4%+35.9%-86.5%-2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.7%+100.0%+66.7%+14.3%-55.6%
Evenly matched — NNDM and XMTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SSYS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$56M$332M$4.0B$205M$734M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$54M$137M$4.4B$209M$666M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.38x-1.15x-65.58x-1.91x-6.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.158.00x116.62x72.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.72x3.24x5.87x169.62x1.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.76x0.62x14.69x3.29x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
SSYS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SSYS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

SSYS delivers a -13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-137 for MVIS. NNDM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSYS scores 6/9 vs MVIS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-16.7%-58.7%-18.8%-137.4%-13.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.2%-48.4%-7.3%-74.3%-10.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-17.2%-15.0%-5.7%-98.3%-5.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.8%-12.5%-7.5%-93.6%-6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943336
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.02x1.26x0.66x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M-$195M$334M$4M-$68M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$205M$15M$32M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$817,000$9M$349M$37M$27M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-209.20x-20.58x-3.54x
SSYS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XMTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XMTR five years ago would be worth $9,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $482 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +161.7% total return vs MVIS's -41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 82.2% vs MVIS's -34.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.1%+1.3%+27.5%-24.9%-5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-0.3%-4.2%+161.7%-41.9%-23.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.0%-40.4%+505.2%-71.3%-40.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.9%-74.6%-8.4%-95.2%-54.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.0%-97.8%-8.4%-63.3%-59.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.1%-15.8%+82.2%-34.0%-16.0%
XMTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LINK and XMTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LINK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MVIS's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs LINK's 35.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.15x1.66x1.89x2.66x1.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.10$2.32$82.53$1.73$12.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.66$1.31$29.60$0.51$7.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.2%+68.1%+96.9%+38.6%+66.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.354.784.344.442.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded22K2.0M823K5.4M831K
Evenly matched — LINK and XMTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

XMTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy", SSYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 647.9% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs -6.3% for XMTR (target: $75). LINK is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLINK logoLINKInterlink Electro…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…XMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.MVIS logoMVISMicroVision, Inc.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.00$5.00$13.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts14736
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.5%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
XMTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SSYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). XMTR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallXometry, Inc. (XMTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LINK vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MVIS vs SSYS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS?

Over the past 5 years, Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) delivered a total return of -8. 4%, compared to -95. 2% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LINK returned -3. 0% versus NNDM's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Interlink Electronics, Inc.

(LINK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus MicroVision, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning MVIS is approximately 131% more volatile than LINK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -74. 3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Interlink Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 45. 8% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS?

Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 0% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps -9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XMTR leads at -6. 6% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSYS leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Stratasys Ltd.

(SSYS) trades at 72. 5x forward P/E versus 158. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 85. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 647. 9% to $5. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS?

In this comparison, LINK (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. NNDM, XMTR, MVIS, SSYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is LINK or NNDM or XMTR or MVIS or SSYS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Interlink Electronics, Inc.

(LINK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 0. 6% yield). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LINK: -3. 0%, MVIS: -63. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between LINK and NNDM and XMTR and MVIS and SSYS?

These companies operate in different sectors (LINK (Technology) and NNDM (Technology) and XMTR (Industrials) and MVIS (Technology) and SSYS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LINK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LINK pays a dividend while NNDM, XMTR, MVIS, SSYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LINK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NNDM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XMTR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MVIS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSYS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LINK and NNDM and XMTR and MVIS and SSYS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LINK: -4.5% · NNDM: 106.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.