Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Regulated Water
Industrial - Machinery
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Chemicals - Specialty | Regulated Water | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $22M | $72.46B | $10.68B | $27.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $16.08B | $2.55B | $9.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $2.08B | $557M | $973M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 44.5% | 33.8% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -50.0% | 17.7% | 35.0% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.6x | 16.7x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $9.43B | $8.34B | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $646M | $35M | $1.48B |
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Ecolab Inc. (ECL) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| Essential Utilities… (WTRG) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.52 vs XYL's 0.92
- +64.8% vs WTRG's -4.7%
ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 96.2%, current ratio 1.08x
- 8.8% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 12.7% vs -31.1%
WTRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.36, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 1.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- 18.6% revenue growth vs ECL's 2.2%
- 21.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 204.7% 10Y total return vs ECL's 139.5%
- PEG 0.91 vs WTRG's 1.16
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- Lower P/E (20.9x vs 30.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs ECL's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.9x vs 30.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs XYL's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs XYL's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.8% vs WTRG's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 12.7% vs -31.1% |
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WTRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ECL leads 2 • LIQT leads 0 • XYL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LIQT and ECL and WTRG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECL is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.1B annually — 957.9x LIQT's $17M. WTRG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $16.1B | $2.6B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $3.5B | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $2.1B | $557M | $973M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $1.9B | -$489M | $966M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +44.5% | +33.8% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.0% | +17.7% | +35.0% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.3% | +12.9% | +21.8% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | +11.8% | -19.1% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.6% | +4.8% | +10.0% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.4% | +19.3% | -23.3% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WTRG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, WTRG trades at a 51% valuation discount to ECL's 35.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTRG offers better value at 1.19x vs XYL's 1.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $72.5B | $10.7B | $27.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $81.2B | $19.0B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.59x | 35.24x | 17.14x | 29.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.64x | 16.75x | 20.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | 1.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.66x | 14.18x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 4.51x | 4.32x | 3.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 7.46x | 1.54x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.05x | — | 30.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTRG's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WTRG scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -70.0% | +22.0% | +8.2% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.5% | +8.8% | +3.1% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.1% | +12.7% | +4.8% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +15.8% | +5.1% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | 0.96x | 1.22x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $8.8B | $8.3B | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $646M | $35M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $9.4B | $8.3B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.46x | 9.82x | 2.88x | 49.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECL five years ago would be worth $11,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs WTRG's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 15.2% vs LIQT's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.9% | -2.0% | -1.6% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.8% | +2.0% | -4.7% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.3% | +52.7% | -3.0% | +11.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +17.3% | -6.2% | +2.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +139.5% | +46.5% | +204.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.8% | +15.2% | -1.0% | +3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTRG is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XYL's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTRG currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs LIQT's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.63x | -0.36x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.35 | $309.27 | $42.37 | $154.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $249.04 | $36.32 | $114.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +83.0% | +89.0% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 46.0 | 36.0 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 1.4M | 2.6M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECL as "Buy", WTRG as "Buy", XYL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for XYL (target: $152) vs 6.1% for WTRG (target: $40). For income investors, WTRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs ECL's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $327.11 | $40.00 | $151.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 18 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +3.5% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 26 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.64 | $1.33 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.0% | +0.1% |
WTRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). ECL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL). Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
On trailing P/E, Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 2x. On forward P/E, Essential Utilities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Essential Utilities, Inc. 's 1. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) delivered a total return of +17. 3%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYL returned +204. 7% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 36β versus Xylem Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning XYL is approximately -357% more volatile than WTRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 122% for Essential Utilities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus 2. 2% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Ecolab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTRG leads at 37. 2% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECL leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Essential Utilities, Inc. 's 1. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Ecolab Inc. — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XYL: 31. 1% to $151. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?
In this comparison, WTRG (3.
5% yield), XYL (1. 4% yield), ECL (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. LIQT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Utilities, Inc.
(WTRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 36), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTRG: +46. 5%, LIQT: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIQT and ECL and WTRG and XYL?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIQT (Industrials) and ECL (Basic Materials) and WTRG (Utilities) and XYL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WTRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ECL, WTRG, XYL pay a dividend while LIQT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.