Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • DK
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-95.3%
ECL
Ecolab Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$72.46B
5Y Perf.+20.7%
WTRG
Essential Utilities, Inc.

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.68B
5Y Perf.-13.8%
XYL
Xylem Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.49B
5Y Perf.+74.3%

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LIQT logoLIQT
ECL logoECL
WTRG logoWTRG
XYL logoXYL
IndustryIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsChemicals - SpecialtyRegulated WaterIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$22M$72.46B$10.68B$27.49B
Revenue (TTM)$17M$16.08B$2.55B$9.09B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$2.08B$557M$973M
Gross Margin4.9%44.5%33.8%38.6%
Operating Margin-50.0%17.7%35.0%13.6%
Forward P/E30.6x16.7x20.9x
Total Debt$12M$9.43B$8.34B$1.94B
Cash & Equiv.$646M$35M$1.48B

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LIQT
ECL
WTRG
XYL
StockMay 20May 26Return
LiqTech Internation… (LIQT)1004.7-95.3%
Ecolab Inc. (ECL)100120.7+20.7%
Essential Utilities… (WTRG)10086.2-13.8%
Xylem Inc. (XYL)100174.3+74.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WTRG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. LiqTech International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. ECL and XYL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.

  • Beta 0.52 vs XYL's 0.92
  • +64.8% vs WTRG's -4.7%
Best for: stability and momentum
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 96.2%, current ratio 1.08x
  • 8.8% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 12.7% vs -31.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
WTRG
Essential Utilities, Inc.
The Income Pick

WTRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.36, yield 3.5%
  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 1.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
  • 18.6% revenue growth vs ECL's 2.2%
  • 21.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XYL
Xylem Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 204.7% 10Y total return vs ECL's 139.5%
  • PEG 0.91 vs WTRG's 1.16
  • Beta 0.92, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.63x
  • Lower P/E (20.9x vs 30.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWTRG logoWTRG18.6% revenue growth vs ECL's 2.2%
ValueXYL logoXYLLower P/E (20.9x vs 30.6x)
Quality / MarginsWTRG logoWTRG21.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Stability / SafetyLIQT logoLIQTBeta 0.52 vs XYL's 0.92
DividendsWTRG logoWTRG3.5% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs XYL's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LIQT logoLIQT+64.8% vs WTRG's -4.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ECL logoECL8.8% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 12.7% vs -31.1%

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LIQTLiqTech International, Inc.
FY 2024
Ceramics Segment
38.6%$6M
Water Segment
37.9%$6M
Plastics Segment
23.2%$3M
Corporate Segment
0.3%$49,496
ECLEcolab Inc.
FY 2025
Global Water
49.6%$8.0B
Global Institutional and Specialty
38.0%$6.1B
Global Pest Elimination
7.8%$1.2B
Global Life Sciences
4.7%$748M
WTRGEssential Utilities, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas
45.3%$1.1B
Water
44.0%$1.1B
Wastewater
9.0%$223M
Other
1.7%$41M
XYLXylem Inc.
FY 2025
Water Infrastructure
40.1%$2.6B
Measurement and Control Solutions
31.7%$2.1B
Applied Water
28.1%$1.8B

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWTRGLAGGINGXYL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LIQT and ECL and WTRG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ECL is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.1B annually — 957.9x LIQT's $17M. WTRG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$16.1B$2.6B$9.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$3.5B$1.2B$1.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$2.1B$557M$973M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M$1.9B-$489M$966M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.9%+44.5%+33.8%+38.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-50.0%+17.7%+35.0%+13.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-53.3%+12.9%+21.8%+10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-39.3%+11.8%-19.1%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.6%+4.8%+10.0%+2.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+69.4%+19.3%-23.3%+14.5%
Evenly matched — LIQT and ECL and WTRG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WTRG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.1x trailing earnings, WTRG trades at a 51% valuation discount to ECL's 35.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTRG offers better value at 1.19x vs XYL's 1.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
Market CapShares × price$22M$72.5B$10.7B$27.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$34M$81.2B$19.0B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.59x35.24x17.14x29.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.64x16.75x20.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x1.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.66x14.18x15.54x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.35x4.51x4.32x3.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.14x7.46x1.54x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF38.05x30.21x
WTRG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTRG's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WTRG scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-70.0%+22.0%+8.2%+8.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-29.5%+8.8%+3.1%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-31.1%+12.7%+4.8%+7.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.8%+5.1%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.17x0.96x1.22x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12M$8.8B$8.3B$463M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$646M$35M$1.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12M$9.4B$8.3B$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.46x9.82x2.88x49.32x
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ECL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ECL five years ago would be worth $11,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs WTRG's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 15.2% vs LIQT's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.9%-2.0%-1.6%-15.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.8%+2.0%-4.7%-3.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.3%+52.7%-3.0%+11.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%+17.3%-6.2%+2.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.9%+139.5%+46.5%+204.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.8%+15.2%-1.0%+3.8%
ECL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WTRG is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XYL's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTRG currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs LIQT's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.52x0.63x-0.36x0.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.35$309.27$42.37$154.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.30$249.04$36.32$114.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.9%+83.0%+89.0%+75.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.046.036.045.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded50K1.4M2.6M2.1M
WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ECL as "Buy", WTRG as "Buy", XYL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for XYL (target: $152) vs 6.1% for WTRG (target: $40). For income investors, WTRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs ECL's 1.03%.

MetricLIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…ECL logoECLEcolab Inc.WTRG logoWTRGEssential Utiliti…XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$327.11$40.00$151.57
# AnalystsCovering analysts371840
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+3.5%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises122615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.64$1.33$1.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.1%+0.0%+0.1%
WTRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WTRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). ECL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallEssential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LIQT vs ECL vs WTRG vs XYL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL). Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

On trailing P/E, Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 2x. On forward P/E, Essential Utilities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Essential Utilities, Inc. 's 1. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) delivered a total return of +17. 3%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYL returned +204. 7% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 36β versus Xylem Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning XYL is approximately -357% more volatile than WTRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 122% for Essential Utilities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus 2. 2% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Ecolab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTRG leads at 37. 2% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECL leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Essential Utilities, Inc. 's 1. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Ecolab Inc. — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XYL: 31. 1% to $151. 57.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL?

In this comparison, WTRG (3.

5% yield), XYL (1. 4% yield), ECL (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. LIQT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LIQT or ECL or WTRG or XYL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Utilities, Inc.

(WTRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 36), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTRG: +46. 5%, LIQT: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LIQT and ECL and WTRG and XYL?

These companies operate in different sectors (LIQT (Industrials) and ECL (Basic Materials) and WTRG (Utilities) and XYL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WTRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ECL, WTRG, XYL pay a dividend while LIQT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LIQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ECL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WTRG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XYL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LIQT and ECL and WTRG and XYL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LIQT: 53.6% · ECL: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.