LIVE vs TILE

For growth investors, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.

6x versus Interface, Inc. at 14. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) delivered a total return of +111. 0%, compared to -65. 8% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TILE returned +76. 0% versus LIVE's +28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Live Ventures Incorporated's 1. 23β — meaning LIVE is approximately 23% more volatile than TILE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to 32. 4% for Interface, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 5. 1% for Live Ventures Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TILE leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, TILE (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LIVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TILE: +76. 0%, LIVE: +28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.