Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $28M | $97M | $5.53B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-35M | $-464M | $-164M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | -237.9% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1M | $98K | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $16M | $714M | $15M |
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixte Biotechnology… (LIXT) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| Oncolytics Biotech … (ONCY) | 100 | 36.9 | -63.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09
- EPS growth 40.2%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 3.26x
- 66.2% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
ONCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 5.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs LIXT's -31.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- -44.1% ROA vs ONCY's -188.3%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs ONCY's +73.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.2% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ONCY's +73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -44.1% ROA vs ONCY's -188.3% |
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories
LIXT leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • ONCY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $55M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$35M | -$487M | -$130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$35M | -$464M | -$164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$26M | -$423M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +99.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | -16.7% | +19.7% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IMVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $97M | $5.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $86M | $4.8B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.10x | -3.00x | -9.97x | -8.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 30.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.40x | 15.70x | 5.83x | 15.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ONCY. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMVT scores 2/9 vs ONCY's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -7.6% | -47.1% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -178.1% | -188.3% | -44.1% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | — | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.2% | -145.5% | -66.1% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.18x | 0.00x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$15M | -$714M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $16M | $714M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1M | $98,000 | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -419.37x | — | — | -4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,748 for LIXT. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs ONCY's +73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs ONCY's -19.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | -8.2% | +5.1% | +92.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.4% | +73.7% | +96.1% | +818.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -47.4% | +40.9% | +621.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -68.5% | +62.4% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | -82.5% | +173.6% | -59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | -19.3% | +12.1% | +93.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIXT and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs ONCY's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.12x | 1.37x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.26 | $1.51 | $30.09 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $0.33 | $13.36 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +59.6% | +90.5% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 45.0 | 60.2 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 1.1M | 1.4M | 991K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONCY as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 59.3% for NKTR (target: $133).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $45.50 | $132.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LIXT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
LIXT vs ONCY vs IMVT vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Oncolytics Biotech Inc.
(ONCY) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -82. 5% for Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (LIXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus ONCY's -82. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 69% more volatile than LIXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 40. 2% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR?
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIXT leads at 0. 0% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LIXT or ONCY or IMVT or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIXT: -31. 5%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LIXT and ONCY and IMVT and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.