Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LKQ vs MPAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
LKQ vs MPAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $7.33B | $220M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.92B | $771M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $517M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.06B | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $9M |
LKQ vs MPAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LKQ vs MPAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LKQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.2%
- 3.7% 10Y total return vs MPAA's -62.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 77.1%, current ratio 1.67x
MPAA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1%
- +24.3% vs LKQ's -24.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs MPAA's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs LKQ's -24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.2% |
LKQ vs MPAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LKQ vs MPAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.9B annually — 18.1x MPAA's $771M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.7% (LKQ) to 0.3% (MPAA). On growth, LKQ holds the edge at +0.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.9B | $771M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $517M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $808M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.2% | -9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.3% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LKQ's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPAA's 8.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $220M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $412M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.22x | -11.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.51x | 15.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 8.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.65x | 5.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. LKQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPAA's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs LKQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.50x | 0.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LKQ and MPAA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LKQ five years ago would be worth $6,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +24.3% total return vs LKQ's -24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs LKQ's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.1% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +143.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | -62.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.4% | +34.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LKQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LKQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPAA's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LKQ currently trades 67.3% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 63.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.67 | $18.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.23 | $9.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.3% | +63.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 87K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LKQ as "Buy" and MPAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 34.7% for LKQ (target: $39). LKQ is the only dividend payer here at 4.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.67 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +2.2% |
LKQ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LKQ vs MPAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LKQ or MPAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LKQ Corporation (LKQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LKQ or MPAA?
On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LKQ or MPAA?
Over the past 5 years, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) delivered a total return of -32.
1%, compared to -51. 7% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LKQ returned +3. 7% versus MPAA's -62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LKQ or MPAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning MPAA is approximately 10% more volatile than LKQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 78% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LKQ or MPAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for LKQ Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPAA leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LKQ or MPAA?
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
4% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKQ leads at 7. 8% versus 5. 3% for MPAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LKQ leads at 38. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LKQ or MPAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 74. 4% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LKQ or MPAA?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MPAA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LKQ or MPAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKQ: +3. 7%, MPAA: -62. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LKQ and MPAA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LKQ pays a dividend while MPAA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.