Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LLYVK vs BATRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
LLYVK vs BATRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $8.96B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $732M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-87M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 130.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.67B | $837M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $112M |
LLYVK vs BATRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Live Group (LLYVK) | 100 | 289.8 | +189.8% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRK) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LLYVK vs BATRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LLYVK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.4% vs BATRK's +27.7%
BATRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 26.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 229.6% 10Y total return vs LLYVK's 188.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs LLYVK's -417.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.2% margin vs LLYVK's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs LLYVK's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs BATRK's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs LLYVK's -1.6%, ROIC 1.0% vs -4.9% |
LLYVK vs BATRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LLYVK vs BATRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLYVK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLYVK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.0x BATRK's $732M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.2% (BATRK) to -5.9% (LLYVK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $732M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$87M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $403M | -$120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | -16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -14.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.9% | -109.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BATRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.0B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -102.64x | -138.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 130.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 36.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.47x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BATRK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATRK delivers a -4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-5 for LLYVK.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | -4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.0% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $612M | $726M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $837M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLYVK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLYVK five years ago would be worth $28,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,721 for BATRK. Over the past 12 months, LLYVK leads with a +32.4% total return vs BATRK's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLYVK at 42.3% vs BATRK's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +33.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +87.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.4% | +229.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.3% | +10.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BATRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LLYVK's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRK currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs LLYVK's 95.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.62 | $52.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.48 | $37.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 324K | 357K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BATRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LLYVK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
LLYVK vs BATRK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LLYVK or BATRK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LLYVK or BATRK?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Live Group (LLYVK) delivered a total return of +188.
4%, compared to +87. 2% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BATRK returned +229. 6% versus LLYVK's +188. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LLYVK or BATRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Liberty Live Group's 0. 82β — meaning LLYVK is approximately 60% more volatile than BATRK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LLYVK or BATRK?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 26. 0% year-over-year, compared to -179. 4% for Liberty Live Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LLYVK or BATRK?
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 2% net margin versus -22. 8% for Liberty Live Group — meaning it keeps -3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BATRK leads at 2. 3% versus -12. 7% for LLYVK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATRK leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LLYVK or BATRK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LLYVK or BATRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +229. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATRK: +229. 6%, LLYVK: +188. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LLYVK and BATRK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.