Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$529.86B
5Y Perf.-83.9%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.12B
5Y Perf.+503.9%
GEVO
Gevo, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$493M
5Y Perf.-69.4%

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LNZA logoLNZA
SPIR logoSPIR
ASTS logoASTS
GEVO logoGEVO
IndustryWaste ManagementSpecialty Business ServicesCommunication EquipmentChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$53M$529.86B$19.12B$493M
Revenue (TTM)$40M$72M$71M$174M
Net Income (TTM)$-76M$-25.02B$-342M$-11M
Gross Margin29.0%40.8%53.4%23.4%
Operating Margin-265.8%-121.4%-405.7%-4.6%
Forward P/E10.0x
Total Debt$82M$8.76B$32M$168M
Cash & Equiv.$43M$24.81B$2.34B$1M

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LNZA
SPIR
ASTS
GEVO
StockSep 21May 26Return
LanzaTech Global, I… (LNZA)1002.3-97.7%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10016.1-83.9%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100603.9+503.9%
Gevo, Inc. (GEVO)10030.6-69.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GEVO leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

LNZA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Angle

SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Growth Play

ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
  • 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GEVO
Gevo, Inc.
The Income Pick

GEVO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 1.64
  • Beta 1.64, current ratio 1.82x
  • -6.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
  • Beta 1.64 vs SPIR's 2.93
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthASTS logoASTS15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
Quality / MarginsGEVO logoGEVO-6.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyGEVO logoGEVOBeta 1.64 vs SPIR's 2.93
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ASTS logoASTS+158.1% vs LNZA's -5.2%
Efficiency (ROA)GEVO logoGEVO-1.7% ROA vs LNZA's -58.8%, ROIC -2.8% vs -147.7%

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LNZALanzaTech Global, Inc.
FY 2024
Engineering and Other Services
47.4%$20M
License and Service
27.1%$11M
Research And Development
25.4%$11M
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
GEVOGevo, Inc.
FY 2025
Ethanol
95.6%$105M
Hydrocarbon
4.4%$5M

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGEVOLAGGINGLNZA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GEVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $174M annually — 4.4x LNZA's $40M. GEVO is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$72M$71M$174M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$102M-$74M-$237M$18M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$76M-$25.0B-$342M-$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$81M-$16.2B-$1.1B-$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.0%+40.8%+53.4%+23.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.7%-121.4%-4.1%-4.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-190.2%-349.6%-4.8%-6.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%-227.0%-16.0%-19.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.7%-26.9%+27.3%+47.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+103.4%+59.5%-55.6%+3.8%
GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LNZA and ASTS and GEVO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$53M$529.9B$19.1B$493M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$91M$513.8B$16.8B$659M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.32x10.01x-48.76x-14.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple102.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.06x7405.21x269.64x3.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.33x4.56x5.68x1.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — LNZA and ASTS and GEVO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GEVO delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LNZA. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNZA's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs LNZA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%-88.4%-21.1%-2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-58.8%-47.3%-12.6%-1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-0.1%-47.1%-2.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-60.8%-0.1%-10.0%-3.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93554
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage6.09x0.08x0.01x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38M-$16.1B-$2.3B$166M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$43M$24.8B$2.3B$1M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$82M$8.8B$32M$168M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.20x-21.20x-0.04x
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for LNZA. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs LNZA's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs LNZA's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+61.8%+106.4%-21.7%-1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.2%+73.1%+158.1%+88.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.4%+198.1%+1194.0%+65.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-79.6%+688.2%-65.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-78.8%+568.8%-98.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-59.7%+43.9%+134.8%+18.2%
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GEVO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GEVO is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEVO currently trades 68.4% from its 52-week high vs LNZA's 31.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.64x2.93x2.82x1.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$71.19$23.59$129.89$2.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.88$6.60$22.47$1.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.8%+68.3%+50.3%+68.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.155.541.853.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded49K1.6M14.9M4.5M
GEVO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LNZA as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", GEVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.4% upside for GEVO (target: $4) vs -75.7% for LNZA (target: $6).

MetricLNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.50$17.25$103.65$3.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts412714
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallGevo, Inc. (GEVO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -97. 7% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gevo, Inc.

(GEVO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 78% more volatile than GEVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for LanzaTech Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEVO leads at -11. 7% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+568. 8% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +568. 8%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between LNZA and SPIR and ASTS and GEVO?

These companies operate in different sectors (LNZA (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and GEVO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LNZA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LNZA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1365%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GEVO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LNZA and SPIR and ASTS and GEVO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LNZA: -6.7% · SPIR: -26.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.