Waste Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Chemicals - Specialty
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $53M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $493M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $72M | $71M | $174M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-76M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -265.8% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $82M | $8.76B | $32M | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $1M |
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanzaTech Global, I… (LNZA) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 16.1 | -83.9% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 603.9 | +503.9% |
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNZA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
GEVO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.64
- Beta 1.64, current ratio 1.82x
- -6.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 1.64 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.64 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs LNZA's -5.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs LNZA's -58.8%, ROIC -2.8% vs -147.7% |
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • LNZA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $174M annually — 4.4x LNZA's $40M. GEVO is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $72M | $71M | $174M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$102M | -$74M | -$237M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$76M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -190.2% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +47.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.4% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LNZA and ASTS and GEVO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $493M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $659M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.32x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -14.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 102.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 3.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.33x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEVO delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LNZA. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNZA's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs LNZA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.8% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.7% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.8% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.09x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $166M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $8.8B | $32M | $168M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.20x | -21.20x | -0.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for LNZA. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs LNZA's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs LNZA's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +61.8% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +88.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +65.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.7% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GEVO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GEVO is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEVO currently trades 68.4% from its 52-week high vs LNZA's 31.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.19 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $2.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $1.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.8% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +68.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNZA as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", GEVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.4% upside for GEVO (target: $4) vs -75.7% for LNZA (target: $6).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LNZA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GEVO: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -97. 7% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 78% more volatile than GEVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for LanzaTech Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEVO leads at -11. 7% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LNZA or SPIR or ASTS or GEVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+568. 8% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +568. 8%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LNZA and SPIR and ASTS and GEVO?
These companies operate in different sectors (LNZA (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and GEVO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LNZA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.