Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Business Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $5.62B | $529.86B | $182.12B | $70.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $538M | $72M | $92.18B | $9.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68M | $-25.02B | $2.27B | $1.97B |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 40.8% | 4.8% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | -121.4% | -5.9% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | 75.8x | 10.0x | 4979.1x | 32.0x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $8.76B | $54.43B | $30.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $24.81B | $10.92B | $2.81B |
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 137.6 | +37.6% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 212.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.70x
SPIR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 4979.1x)
- +73.1% vs LOAR's -38.4%
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 34.5% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs BA's 94.6%
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
- 21.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 4979.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.1% vs LOAR's -38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 20.9% vs -0.1% |
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 4 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • LOAR leads 0 • BA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 1288.3x SPIR's $72M. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, LOAR holds the edge at +36.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $538M | $72M | $92.2B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | -$74M | -$3.4B | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68M | -$25.0B | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | -$16.2B | -$1.0B | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.8% | +40.8% | +4.8% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | -121.4% | -5.9% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -349.6% | +2.5% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | -227.0% | -1.1% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.1% | -26.9% | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +59.5% | +31.3% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TDG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 89% valuation discount to BA's 93.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDG's 21.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOAR's 32.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $529.9B | $182.1B | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $513.8B | $225.6B | $97.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 80.08x | 10.01x | 93.16x | 38.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 75.83x | — | 4979.09x | 32.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.92x | — | — | 21.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.33x | 7405.21x | 2.04x | 7.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.90x | 4.56x | 32.27x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 56.65x | — | — | 38.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. LOAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOAR scores 6/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -88.4% | +2.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | -47.3% | +1.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | -0.1% | -9.5% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | -0.1% | -9.1% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.08x | 9.97x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$71M | -$16.1B | $43.5B | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $24.8B | $10.9B | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $8.8B | $54.4B | $30.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.11x | 9.20x | 1.89x | 2.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDG five years ago would be worth $24,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +73.1% total return vs LOAR's -38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 43.9% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.5% | +106.4% | +1.4% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.4% | +73.1% | +24.5% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.1% | +198.1% | +17.1% | +86.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.1% | -79.6% | -1.9% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.1% | -78.8% | +94.6% | +595.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.2% | +43.9% | +5.4% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BA and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs LOAR's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 2.93x | 0.97x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.67 | $23.59 | $254.35 | $1623.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.15 | $6.60 | $176.77 | $1123.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +68.3% | +90.8% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 55.5 | 56.9 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.6M | 6.5M | 370K |
Analyst Outlook
TDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOAR as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", BA as "Buy", TDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.5% upside for LOAR (target: $94) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $94.00 | $17.25 | $263.67 | $1617.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | 54 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | +13.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.43 | $165.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
TDG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LOAR vs SPIR vs BA vs TDG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus The Boeing Company at 93. 2x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 32. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
Over the past 5 years, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +595. 3% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 272% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Loar Holdings Inc. grew EPS 212. 5% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOAR leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 32.
0x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4947. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOAR: 56. 5% to $94. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LOAR, SPIR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LOAR or SPIR or BA or TDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOAR and SPIR and BA and TDG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TDG pays a dividend while LOAR, SPIR, BA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.