Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOCL vs AREC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
LOCL vs AREC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Coal |
| Market Cap | $14M | $230M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $145K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-122M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 2.4% | 96.6% |
| Operating Margin | -135.7% | -203.0% |
| Total Debt | $437M | $221M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $937K | $604K |
LOCL vs AREC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Bounti Corpor… (LOCL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| American Resources … (AREC) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOCL vs AREC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
- Rev growth 38.4%, EPS growth 9.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 291.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 0.34x
AREC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 127.0% 10Y total return vs LOCL's -98.7%
- 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +165.2% vs LOCL's -33.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.4% revenue growth vs AREC's -97.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -265.2% margin vs AREC's -262.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs AREC's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +165.2% vs LOCL's -33.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.8% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC -35.8% vs -13.2% |
LOCL vs AREC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOCL vs AREC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $46M annually — 317.0x AREC's $145,025. LOCL is the more profitable business, keeping -2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AREC's -262.0%. On growth, LOCL holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $145,025 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$122M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +96.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -135.7% | -203.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -262.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.1% | -48.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.1% | -78.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | +56.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LOCL and AREC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $230M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450M | $450M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -4.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 600.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOCL scores 4/9 vs AREC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.2% | -18.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | -35.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -61.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $436M | $220M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $937,000 | $604,485 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $221M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | -2.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AREC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AREC five years ago would be worth $7,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $127 for LOCL. Over the past 12 months, AREC leads with a +165.2% total return vs LOCL's -33.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AREC at 14.6% vs LOCL's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.5% | -16.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.5% | +165.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | +50.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +127.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LOCL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREC's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOCL currently trades 40.3% from its 52-week high vs AREC's 31.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $7.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $0.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +31.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AREC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
AREC is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LOCL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AREC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LOCL vs AREC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOCL or AREC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the stronger pick with 38.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). Analysts rate American Resources Corporation (AREC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOCL or AREC?
Over the past 5 years, American Resources Corporation (AREC) delivered a total return of -25.
3%, compared to -98. 7% for Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AREC returned +127. 0% versus LOCL's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOCL or AREC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus American Resources Corporation's 2. 48β — meaning AREC is approximately 183% more volatile than LOCL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LOCL or AREC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is pulling ahead at 38.
4% versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Local Bounti Corporation grew EPS 9. 4% year-over-year, compared to -246. 7% for American Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOCL leads at 291. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOCL or AREC?
Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the more profitable company, earning -314.
4% net margin versus -104. 7% for American Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps -314. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOCL leads at -154. 6% versus -86. 3% for AREC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOCL leads at 10. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LOCL or AREC?
In this comparison, AREC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LOCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LOCL or AREC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87)). American Resources Corporation (AREC) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOCL: -98. 7%, AREC: +127. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LOCL and AREC?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOCL (Consumer Defensive) and AREC (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LOCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AREC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AREC pays a dividend while LOCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare AREC vs METC
METC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to AREC.
Compare LOCL vs HYFM
HYFM overlaps with LOCL in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With METC + AMR
METC and AMR are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.