Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $4.46B | $2.83B | $4.38B | $3.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $401M | $676M | $952M | $1.04B | $566M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $121M | $546M | $351M | $502M | $331M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 40.6% | 27.5% | 51.8% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | 35.0% | 44.4% | 27.5% | 38.8% | 50.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 8.5x | 6.0x | 8.6x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $713M | $576M | $55M | $619M | $429M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $317M | $117M | $831M | $752M | $79M |
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) | 100 | 490.1 | +390.1% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 365.7 | +265.7% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 452.0 | +352.0% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 458.5 | +358.5% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 311.1 | +211.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 9.3%
- 9.3% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs LPG's 5.1%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0%
- 80.8% margin vs LPG's 30.1%
- +160.2% vs DHT's +79.6%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs LPG's 13.80
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x)
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth -13.0%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
- Beta 0.27 vs LPG's 0.98, lower leverage
- 21.3% ROA vs LPG's 6.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs 5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs LPG's 30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs LPG's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs DHT's +79.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs LPG's 6.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs 5.7% |
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories
INSW leads 1 • LPG leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • DHT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 2.6x LPG's $401M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPG's 30.1%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $401M | $676M | $952M | $1.0B | $566M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $211M | $465M | $348M | $580M | $388M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $121M | $546M | $351M | $502M | $331M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $193M | $113M | $389M | -$131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +40.6% | +27.5% | +51.8% | +47.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +44.4% | +27.5% | +38.8% | +50.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +80.8% | +36.9% | +48.4% | +58.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +28.5% | +11.8% | +37.5% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | -91.3% | -26.4% | +46.2% | +57.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +122.0% | +4.8% | +46.0% | +2.5% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 57% valuation discount to LPG's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs LPG's 13.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $4.5B | $2.8B | $4.4B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.9B | $2.1B | $4.3B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.60x | 14.48x | 8.05x | 12.05x | 14.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.21x | 8.52x | 6.00x | 8.58x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.80x | — | 0.26x | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.51x | 10.48x | 6.80x | 8.68x | 12.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 5.29x | 2.97x | 4.67x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 2.21x | 1.38x | 1.30x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | 117.08x | 25.09x | 8.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $11 for LPG. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LPG's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +27.1% | +17.2% | +15.9% | +29.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +20.1% | +15.7% | +12.6% | +21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +9.4% | +12.5% | +7.2% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +12.1% | +10.9% | +8.4% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.29x | 0.03x | 0.19x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $396M | $459M | -$776M | -$133M | $350M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $317M | $117M | $831M | $752M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $713M | $576M | $55M | $619M | $429M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.77x | 0.90x | 109.95x | 6.82x | 25.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,217 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs DHT's +79.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs STNG's 24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.7% | +96.5% | +58.3% | +71.3% | +65.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.7% | +160.2% | +80.3% | +115.3% | +79.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +179.7% | +136.5% | +92.7% | +167.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.7% | +438.1% | +513.8% | +359.0% | +282.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.8% | +1014.5% | +187.7% | +62.8% | +318.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +40.9% | +33.2% | +24.4% | +38.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPG and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPG currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.43x | 0.35x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $91.58 | $83.54 | $87.39 | $20.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.03 | $35.60 | $41.05 | $37.96 | $10.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +98.5% | +97.3% | +96.9% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 67.3 | 57.9 | 60.5 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 489K | 597K | 542K | 1.2M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LPG and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPG as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", DHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, LPG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.32% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $83.33 | $90.00 | $85.33 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 | 23 | 31 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +3.2% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.71 | $2.92 | $1.98 | $1.69 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
LPG vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +282. 2% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 0. 98β — meaning LPG is approximately 249% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 68% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Dorian LPG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LPG leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 25. 5% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for Dorian LPG Ltd. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is LPG or INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, LPG: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPG and INSW and TNK and STNG and DHT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.