Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LPG vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
LPG vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $401M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $121M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 35.0% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $713M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $317M | $831M |
LPG vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) | 100 | 484.3 | +384.3% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPG vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 9.3%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 9.3% yield, vs TNK's 2.4%
TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -22.6%, EPS growth -13.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- PEG 0.19 vs LPG's 13.80
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -22.6% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 9.2x), PEG 0.19 vs 13.80 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs LPG's 30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs LPG's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, vs TNK's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.7% vs TNK's +80.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs LPG's 6.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 5.7% |
LPG vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LPG vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 2.4x LPG's $401M. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPG's 30.1%. On growth, LPG holds the edge at +48.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $401M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $211M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $121M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +122.0% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 57% valuation discount to LPG's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs LPG's 13.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.60x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.21x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.80x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.51x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for LPG. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LPG's 0.68x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $396M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $317M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $713M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.77x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LPG and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $41,368 for LPG. Over the past 12 months, LPG leads with a +97.7% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 33.2% vs LPG's 30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.7% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.7% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.7% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.8% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPG and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.03 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 489K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
LPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LPG as "Buy" and TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs 5.5% for LPG (target: $42). For income investors, LPG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.32% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.71 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
LPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LPG vs TNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPG or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger pick with -22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPG or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPG or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +313. 7% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPG returned +506. 8% versus TNK's +187. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPG or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 0. 98β — meaning LPG is approximately 178% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 68% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPG or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is pulling ahead at -22. 6% versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Dorian LPG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LPG leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPG or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 25. 5% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPG leads at 31. 9% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPG leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPG or TNK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for Dorian LPG Ltd. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPG or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is LPG or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 4% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNK: +187. 7%, LPG: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPG and TNK?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.