Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LPLA vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
LPLA vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $26.27B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.99B | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $863M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $7.26B | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $43M |
LPLA vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPL Financial Holdi… (LPLA) | 100 | 458.9 | +358.9% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPLA vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.2%, EPS growth -22.2%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs CSWC's 232.4%
- 37.2% NII/revenue growth vs CSWC's 7.7%
CSWC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84
- Beta 0.84, yield 10.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% NII/revenue growth vs CSWC's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 14.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs LPLA's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CSWC's 10.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs LPLA's -1.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% |
LPLA vs CSWC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LPLA vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 103.7x CSWC's $164M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPLA's 5.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.0B | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $863M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CSWC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, CSWC trades at a 45% valuation discount to LPLA's 30.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LPLA's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.3B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.5B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.00x | 16.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.57x | 10.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.15x | 27.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 8.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPLA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LPLA delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for CSWC. CSWC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LPLA's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPLA scores 3/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.2B | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.3B | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.85x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LPLA five years ago would be worth $21,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,178 for CSWC. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.7% total return vs LPLA's -1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 21.3% vs LPLA's 20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.3% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | +78.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.1% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1283.9% | +232.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.2% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSWC is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPLA's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LPLA's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $403.58 | $24.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $281.51 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 898K | 663K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LPLA and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LPLA as "Buy" and CSWC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.6% upside for LPLA (target: $441) vs -7.4% for CSWC (target: $23). For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.07% vs LPLA's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $441.00 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +10.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LPLA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LPLA vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPLA or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is the stronger pick with 37. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPLA or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the cheapest at 16.
5x versus LPL Financial Holdings Inc. at 30. 0x. On forward P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPLA or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) delivered a total return of +113. 1%, compared to +51. 8% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPLA returned +1284% versus CSWC's +232. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPLA or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus LPL Financial Holdings Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning LPLA is approximately 32% more volatile than CSWC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 136% for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPLA or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is pulling ahead at 37. 2% versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LPL Financial Holdings Inc. grew EPS -22. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Capital Southwest Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPLA or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus 5. 1% for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus 13. 4% for LPLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSWC leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPLA or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) trades at 10.
2x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPLA: 34. 6% to $441. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPLA or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 0. 4% for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA).
09Is LPLA or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 10. 1% yield, +232. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSWC: +232. 4%, LPLA: +1284%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPLA and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPLA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CSWC pays a dividend while LPLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.