Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.67B
5Y Perf.+358.7%
INSM
Insmed Incorporated

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.62B
5Y Perf.+317.0%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+133.1%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-54.9%

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LQDA logoLQDA
INSM logoINSM
RARE logoRARE
MNKD logoMNKD
ACAD logoACAD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$3.67B$22.62B$2.57B$1.10B$3.86B
Revenue (TTM)$69M$606M$669M$361M$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-122M$-1.28B$-609M$-24M$376M
Gross Margin89.4%79.4%83.6%79.3%91.5%
Operating Margin-155.0%-194.0%-83.9%4.1%7.4%
Forward P/E17.6x217.8x55.6x
Total Debt$122M$768M$1.28B$473M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$176M$510M$434M$75M$178M

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACADLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LQDA
INSM
RARE
MNKD
ACAD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Liquidia Corporation (LQDA)100458.7+358.7%
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)100417.0+317.0%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100233.1+133.1%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.1-54.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LQDA and INSM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Insmed Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ACAD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
The Value Play

LQDA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (17.6x vs 217.8x)
  • +172.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
Best for: value and momentum
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
The Income Pick

INSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 0.54
  • Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs LQDA's 280.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MNKD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Quality Compounder

ACAD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 34.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
  • 26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINSM logoINSM66.7% revenue growth vs LQDA's -20.0%
ValueLQDA logoLQDALower P/E (17.6x vs 217.8x)
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
Stability / SafetyINSM logoINSMBeta 0.54 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LQDA logoLQDA+172.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5%

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LQDALiquidia Corporation
FY 2020
Promotion Agreement
100.0%$739,628
Research and Development Services
0.0%$0
INSMInsmed Incorporated
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$606M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGMNKD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 15.8x LQDA's $69M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, LQDA holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$606M$669M$361M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$106M-$1.2B-$536M$25M$96M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$122M-$1.3B-$609M-$24M$376M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$108M-$998M-$487M$13M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.4%+79.4%+83.6%+79.3%+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-155.0%-194.0%-83.9%+4.1%+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-176.0%-2.1%-91.0%-6.6%+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-155.8%-164.5%-72.8%+3.6%+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.2%+152.6%-2.4%+15.1%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+86.4%-16.7%-17.2%-2.2%-81.8%
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 94% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.3x.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$3.7B$22.6B$2.6B$1.1B$3.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.6B$22.9B$3.4B$1.5B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-25.47x-16.35x-4.48x177.50x9.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.58x217.79x55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.26x26.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue262.27x37.30x3.82x3.14x3.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share43.06x30.30x3.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF80.08x36.74x
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LQDA's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs LQDA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.5%-168.4%-6.1%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-57.3%-45.8%-3.9%+26.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.0%-86.5%-89.4%+21.6%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-84.1%-66.8%-46.4%+8.3%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.58x1.04x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M$258M$842M$399M-$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$176M$510M$434M$75M$178M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$122M$768M$1.3B$473M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.63x-14.23x-14.49x0.75x
ACAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LQDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LQDA five years ago would be worth $159,547 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, LQDA leads with a +172.2% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDA at 77.2% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%-40.8%+10.7%-36.6%-13.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+172.2%+53.5%-21.8%-26.8%+52.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+456.3%+454.5%-44.5%-8.5%+4.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1495.5%+221.7%-77.2%-17.2%+7.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+280.9%+793.5%-59.4%-46.2%-22.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+77.2%+77.0%-17.8%-2.9%+1.5%
LQDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LQDA and INSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LQDA currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.17x0.54x1.36x1.09x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.67$212.75$42.37$6.51$27.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.85$63.81$18.29$2.23$14.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.6%+49.3%+61.7%+54.5%+81.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.241.966.674.344.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M2.3M1.8M6.4M1.8M
Evenly matched — LQDA and INSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LQDA as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 30.1% for LQDA (target: $55).

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$55.00$217.11$48.36$7.00$34.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts735331937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LQDA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LQDA vs INSM vs RARE vs MNKD vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 0% for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, Liquidia Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

Over the past 5 years, Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) delivered a total return of +1495%, compared to -77.

2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +763. 6% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 154% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 158% for Liquidia Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.

7% versus -20. 0% for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -931. 7% for Liquidia Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNKD leads at 11. 1% versus -866. 6% for LQDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) trades at 17.

6x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 200. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107. 2% to $217. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LQDA or INSM or RARE or MNKD or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

54), +763. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +763. 6%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LQDA and INSM and RARE and MNKD and ACAD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LQDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LQDA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 560%
  • Gross Margin > 53%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 76%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNKD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LQDA and INSM and RARE and MNKD and ACAD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LQDA: 1121.7% · INSM: 152.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.