Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LQDT vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LQDT vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $480M | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.3x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $1.87B |
LQDT vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity Services,… (LQDT) | 100 | 634.9 | +534.9% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LQDT vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LQDT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 6.9%, current ratio 1.38x
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 24.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.2% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs LQDT's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs LQDT's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs LQDT's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs LQDT's 8.0%, ROIC 16.8% vs 60.8% |
LQDT vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LQDT vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 24.2x LQDT's $480M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LQDT's 6.3%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $480M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LQDT and EBAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 41% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBAY's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $964M | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.67x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.33x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.19x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.07x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LQDT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $14 for LQDT. LQDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LQDT scores 7/9 vs EBAY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +60.8% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LQDT and EBAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,784 for LQDT. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +54.2% total return vs LQDT's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDT at 37.0% vs EBAY's 33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.1% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.8% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +508.2% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.0% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EBAY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LQDT's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.83 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.67 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.6 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
EBAY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LQDT as "Buy" and EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.4% upside for LQDT (target: $44) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). LQDT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LQDT vs EBAY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LQDT or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LQDT or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LQDT or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to +47. 8% for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LQDT returned +508. 2% versus EBAY's +369. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LQDT or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Liquidity Services, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning LQDT is approximately 3% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LQDT or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liquidity Services, Inc. grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LQDT or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 5. 9% for Liquidity Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus 7. 4% for LQDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LQDT or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LQDT: 21. 4% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LQDT or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LQDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LQDT or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, LQDT: +508. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LQDT and EBAY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY pays a dividend while LQDT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.