Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LRE vs DOUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
LRE vs DOUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $18M | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36.91B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.12B | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $11.60B | $103M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.30B | $120M |
LRE vs DOUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.3 | -73.7% |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRE vs DOUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- -78.3% 10Y total return vs DOUG's -79.5%
DOUG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +17.0% vs LRE's +5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% FFO/revenue growth vs DOUG's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 21.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs DOUG's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs DOUG's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.0% vs LRE's +5.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs DOUG's 3.2%, ROIC 4.8% vs -26.1% |
LRE vs DOUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LRE vs DOUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LRE and DOUG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 35.7x DOUG's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (LRE) to 1.5% (DOUG). On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36.9B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | -$17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.9% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LRE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 66% valuation discount to DOUG's 12.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $171M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.28x | 12.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.02x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $10 for DOUG. DOUG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRE scores 5/9 vs DOUG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -26.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | -16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.74x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.3B | -$17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.6B | $103M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.14x | 4.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOUG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRE five years ago would be worth $2,175 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,050 for DOUG. Over the past 12 months, DOUG leads with a +17.0% total return vs LRE's +5.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOUG at -7.6% vs LRE's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.7% | +17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -79.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -79.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.9% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LRE and DOUG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOUG's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOUG currently trades 66.6% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $3.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $1.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 746K |
Analyst Outlook
LRE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
LRE is the only dividend payer here at 0.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LRE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DOUG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LRE vs DOUG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRE or DOUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRE or DOUG?
On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 3x versus Douglas Elliman Inc. at 12. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRE or DOUG?
Over the past 5 years, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) delivered a total return of -78. 3%, compared to -79. 5% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRE returned -78. 3% versus DOUG's -79. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRE or DOUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Douglas Elliman Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning DOUG is approximately 116% more volatile than LRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRE or DOUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 3. 8% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Douglas Elliman Inc. grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRE or DOUG?
Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 1. 5% for Douglas Elliman Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LRE leads at 4. 7% versus -5. 9% for DOUG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOUG leads at 16. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LRE or DOUG?
In this comparison, LRE (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. DOUG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LRE or DOUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 0. 9% yield). Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRE: -78. 3%, DOUG: -79. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LRE and DOUG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LRE pays a dividend while DOUG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.