Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LRE vs NMRK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd American Depositary Shares

Real Estate - Development

Real EstateNASDAQ • JP
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-73.3%
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.01B
5Y Perf.+154.0%

LRE vs NMRK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LRE logoLRE
NMRK logoNMRK
IndustryReal Estate - DevelopmentReal Estate - Services
Market Cap$18M$3.01B
Revenue (TTM)$36.91B$3.29B
Net Income (TTM)$1.12B$126M
Gross Margin16.4%98.6%
Operating Margin5.0%7.1%
Forward P/E4.4x8.7x
Total Debt$11.60B$2.00B
Cash & Equiv.$1.30B$349M

LRE vs NMRKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LRE
NMRK
StockSep 23May 26Return
Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE)10026.7-73.3%
Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK)100254.0+154.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LRE vs NMRK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LRE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Newmark Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd American Depositary Shares
The Real Estate Income Play

LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.42x
  • Beta 0.84, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.42x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NMRK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • 26.5% 10Y total return vs LRE's -77.9%
  • 21.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LRE's 8.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNMRK logoNMRK21.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LRE's 8.6%
ValueLRE logoLRELower P/E (4.4x vs 8.7x)
Quality / MarginsNMRK logoNMRK3.8% margin vs LRE's 3.0%
Stability / SafetyLRE logoLREBeta 0.84 vs NMRK's 1.58
DividendsLRE logoLRE0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NMRK's 0.5%
Momentum (1Y)NMRK logoNMRK+47.9% vs LRE's +10.1%
Efficiency (ROA)LRE logoLRE6.5% ROA vs NMRK's 2.4%, ROIC 4.8% vs 5.2%

LRE vs NMRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LRELead Real Estate Co., Ltd American Depositary Shares
FY 2024
Real Estate
48.8%$18.5B
Land
45.1%$17.1B
Construction
3.6%$1.4B
Product and Service, Other
1.2%$464M
Hotel
0.6%$232M
Commission
0.3%$101M
Property Management
0.2%$59M
Other (2)
0.2%$72M
NMRKNewmark Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Leasing And Other Commissions
31.5%$1.0B
Management Services
30.0%$954M
Investment Advice
17.6%$559M
Servicing Fees And Other
9.1%$290M
Mortgage Brokerage And Debt Placement
8.0%$254M
Servicing
3.9%$123M

LRE vs NMRK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMRKLAGGINGLRE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 11.2x NMRK's $3.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (NMRK) to 3.0% (LRE). On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36.9B$3.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.0B$415M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.1B$126M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.8B$155M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+16.4%+98.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%+7.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.0%+3.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.5%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.9%+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+44.9%+146.7%
NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LRE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 4.4x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 82% valuation discount to NMRK's 24.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMRK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LRE's 13.1x.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
Market CapShares × price$18M$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$83M$4.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS4.39x24.01x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.65x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.09x11.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.15x0.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.65x2.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.12x
LRE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for NMRK. NMRK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMRK scores 7/9 vs LRE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+26.5%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.5%+2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.8%+5.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.1%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.74x1.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10.3B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.3B$349M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11.6B$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense49.14x7.20x
NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NMRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMRK five years ago would be worth $15,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,211 for LRE. Over the past 12 months, NMRK leads with a +47.9% total return vs LRE's +10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMRK at 41.8% vs LRE's -39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-25.1%-3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.1%+47.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.9%+185.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.9%+55.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.9%+26.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.5%+41.8%
NMRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LRE and NMRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMRK's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NMRK currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.84x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.97$19.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$10.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.1%+82.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.149.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K1.6M
Evenly matched — LRE and NMRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, LRE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.91% vs NMRK's 0.52%.

MetricLRE logoLRELead Real Estate …NMRK logoNMRKNewmark Group, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.87$0.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.2%
LRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LRE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallNewmark Group, Inc. (NMRK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LRE vs NMRK: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LRE or NMRK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LRE or NMRK?

On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.

, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Newmark Group, Inc. at 24. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LRE or NMRK?

Over the past 5 years, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -77. 9% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMRK returned +26. 5% versus LRE's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LRE or NMRK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lead Real Estate Co.

, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 89% more volatile than LRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LRE or NMRK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 8. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmark Group, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LRE or NMRK?

Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus 3. 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMRK leads at 7. 0% versus 4. 7% for LRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMRK leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — LRE or NMRK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 5% for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK).

08

Is LRE or NMRK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lead Real Estate Co.

, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 0. 9% yield). Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRE: -77. 9%, NMRK: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between LRE and NMRK?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LRE is a small-cap deep-value stock; NMRK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LRE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMRK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LRE and NMRK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LRE: 19.9% · NMRK: 15.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(LRE: 3.0% · NMRK: 3.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LRE: 4.4x · NMRK: 24.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.