Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LRN vs LOPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
LRN vs LOPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $3.90B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.54B | $817M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $308M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 38.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $550M | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $782M | $112M |
LRN vs LOPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stride, Inc. (LRN) | 100 | 372.4 | +272.4% |
| Grand Canyon Educat… (LOPE) | 100 | 168.5 | +68.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRN vs LOPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs LOPE's 272.4%
LOPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 26.8%, current ratio 3.65x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 3.65x
- 26.9% margin vs LRN's 12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.9% revenue growth vs LOPE's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 16.3x), PEG 0.22 vs 2.27 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs LRN's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs LRN's 0.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.2% vs LRN's -42.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs LRN's 13.1%, ROIC 32.5% vs 22.0% |
LRN vs LOPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LRN vs LOPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOPE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3.1x LOPE's $817M. LOPE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LRN's 12.2%. On growth, LRN holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $817M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | $341M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $308M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $400M | $260M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +38.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +31.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LRN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, LRN trades at a 28% valuation discount to LOPE's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LRN offers better value at 0.26x vs LOPE's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.41x | 21.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.02x | 16.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 13.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.62x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.00x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.47x | 18.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $20 for LRN. LOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRN scores 7/9 vs LOPE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +21.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.0% | +32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.6% | +33.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$233M | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $782M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $550M | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 36.09x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,405 for LOPE. Over the past 12 months, LOPE leads with a -15.2% total return vs LRN's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LRN at 30.5% vs LOPE's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.9% | -0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.3% | -15.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.2% | +47.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.1% | +74.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +666.0% | +272.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.5% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LOPE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOPE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRN's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOPE currently trades 73.7% from its 52-week high vs LRN's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.17 | $223.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.61 | $149.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.6% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 744K | 244K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LRN as "Hold" and LOPE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.4% upside for LRN (target: $110) vs 10.9% for LOPE (target: $182).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.50 | $182.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +5.9% |
LOPE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LRN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
LRN vs LOPE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRN or LOPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). Stride, Inc. (LRN) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRN or LOPE?
On trailing P/E, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Stride, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stride, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRN or LOPE?
Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to +74. 1% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +666. 0% versus LOPE's +272. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRN or LOPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Stride, Inc. 's 0. 46β — meaning LRN is approximately 30% more volatile than LOPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 37% for Stride, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRN or LOPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus 7. 1% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stride, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -0. 3% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRN leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRN or LOPE?
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 12. 0% for Stride, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOPE leads at 27. 5% versus 15. 0% for LRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOPE leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRN or LOPE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stride, Inc. (LRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Stride, Inc. (LRN) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LRN: 19. 4% to $109. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRN or LOPE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LRN or LOPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), +666. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRN: +666. 0%, LOPE: +272. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRN and LOPE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOPE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.